The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant’s conviction of dealing in methamphetamine, finding that pill dough
created while making the drug could be used to count toward the three grams needed to charge someone with Class A felony dealing.
In James R. Hundley v. State of Indiana, No. 24A01-1010-CR-550, James Hundley challenged his conviction
of and sentence for Class A felony dealing in methamphetamine. Police went to Hundley’s grandparents’ property
on a tip that methamphetamine was being made there. The grandparents took police to a secluded, wooded area behind their home
where their grandson, James, hung out. Police saw evidence of methamphetamine and obtained a search warrant for Hundley’s
truck. Inside they found more evidence of manufacturing of methamphetamine, including pill dough, which is produced during
an intermediate step in making the drug, but contains methamphetamine. Hundley wasn’t there while police were on the
property.
Hundley claimed that the state didn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the one who made the meth at the
campsite. But the evidence ties Hundley to the drug and shows he had the intent and capability to maintain control over the
meth lab. The meth lab was found in his truck, which was locked and no one else had access to it. A pill bottle was found
with his name on it, and after he was arrested, Hundley admitted to his involvement with the meth lab.
Hundley also challenged his conviction on the grounds that the state didn’t prove he was dealing meth because it didn’t
show that the weight of the drug found was in excess of three grams. The conviction was based on the weight of the pill dough
sample, and that contained other material in addition to methamphetamine.
“We hold that where, as here, the intermediate step is so near the end of the manufacturing process that the final
product is present in the chemical compound, that substance qualifies as an ‘adulterated drug’ for purposes of
our manufacturing statutes,” wrote Judge Edward Najam.
The COA has previously held that the additional weight of water added to pure cocaine may be considered when determining
the weight of the cocaine. In addition, the statute prohibits the manufacture of methamphetamine “pure or adulterated,”
so the production of the drug is prohibited, even if the meth produced is impure, the judge added.
The appellate judges also upheld Hundley’s 40-year sentence, with 10 years suspended to probation.














Conversations
0 Comments
Add Comment