ILNews

COA reverses piercing of corporate veil, but upholds slander of title finding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Hendricks County storage facility’s claims of breach of contract and slander of title were affirmed on appeal against a contractor hired by the facility to provide excavation services. The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the piercing of Country Contractors Inc.’s corporate veil to find its two shareholders personally liable.

A Westside Storage of Indianapolis Inc. hired Country Contractors in August 2007 and work began in summer of 2008. Country shareholders Jahn and Stephen Songer were not involved in the contract negotiations as another employee worked with Westside. Country then subcontracted out most of the work. It left the worksite without completing the job and didn’t pay several subcontractors.

Those subcontractors filed mechanic’s liens, which Westside paid. It had to hire another company to complete the job. Complicating the matter is that Country filed a notice of intent to hold a mechanic’s lien on Westside’s property in the amount of the total owed to the subcontractors.

Westside sued, alleging breach of contract and slander of title, and it requested piercing of the corporate veil to hold the Songers personally liable.

The trial court ruled in favor of Westside and against Country and the Songers personally, awarding $117,000 in damages, which consisted of costs to complete the project, prejudgment interest, attorney fees and damages for delay of the project caused by Country’s breach.

In Country Contractors, Inc., Stephen Songer, and Jahn Songer v. A Westside Storage of Indianapolis, Inc., 32A01-1304-CC-155, the Court of Appeals reversed the piercing of the corporate veil, finding that the Songers did not use the corporation to engage in misconduct to their own benefit. Westside also failed to establish that Country’s dwindling capital was due to anything other than a general downturn in the economy or construction industry, Judge Terry Crone wrote.

Crone also noted that lack of recourse because Country is now bankrupt is “simply not a proper basis for piercing the corporate veil.”

The judges affirmed the slander of title finding with respect to Country, however. When Country filed its lien claim, both the subcontractors’ lien claims and the release of lien based on Westside’s direct payment to the subcontractors were on file in the county records. As such, Country had constructive notice of those entries, and its filing of an invalid lien claim constitutes evidence sufficient to support the finding that it slandered Westside’s title.

The $17,500 in attorney fees award is reasonable, but the COA remanded for further proceedings regarding delay damages and prejudgment interest because the nearly $34,000 amount adopted by the trial court was speculative.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Im very happy for you, getting ready to go down that dirt road myself, and im praying for the same outcome, because it IS sometimes in the childs best interest to have visitation with grandparents. Thanks for sharing, needed to hear some positive posts for once.

  2. Been there 4 months with 1 paycheck what can i do

  3. our hoa has not communicated any thing that takes place in their "executive meetings" not executive session. They make decisions in these meetings, do not have an agenda, do not notify association memebers and do not keep general meetings minutes. They do not communicate info of any kind to the member, except annual meeting, nobody attends or votes because they think the board is self serving. They keep a deposit fee from club house rental for inspection after someone uses it, there is no inspection I know becausee I rented it, they did not disclose to members that board memebers would be keeping this money, I know it is only 10 dollars but still it is not their money, they hire from within the board for paid positions, no advertising and no request for bids from anyone else, I atteended last annual meeting, went into executive session to elect officers in that session the president brought up the motion to give the secretary a raise of course they all agreed they hired her in, then the minutes stated that a diffeerent board member motioned to give this raise. This board is very clickish and has done things anyway they pleased for over 5 years, what recourse to members have to make changes in the boards conduct

  4. Where may I find an attorney working Pro Bono? Many issues with divorce, my Disability, distribution of IRA's, property, money's and pressured into agreement by my attorney. Leaving me far less than 5% of all after 15 years of marriage. No money to appeal, disabled living on disability income. Attorney's decision brought forward to judge, no evidence ever to finalize divorce. Just 2 weeks ago. Please help.

  5. For the record no one could answer the equal protection / substantive due process challenge I issued in the first post below. The lawless and accountable only to power bureaucrats never did either. All who interface with the Indiana law examiners or JLAP be warned.

ADVERTISEMENT