ILNews

COA reverses piercing of corporate veil, but upholds slander of title finding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Hendricks County storage facility’s claims of breach of contract and slander of title were affirmed on appeal against a contractor hired by the facility to provide excavation services. The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the piercing of Country Contractors Inc.’s corporate veil to find its two shareholders personally liable.

A Westside Storage of Indianapolis Inc. hired Country Contractors in August 2007 and work began in summer of 2008. Country shareholders Jahn and Stephen Songer were not involved in the contract negotiations as another employee worked with Westside. Country then subcontracted out most of the work. It left the worksite without completing the job and didn’t pay several subcontractors.

Those subcontractors filed mechanic’s liens, which Westside paid. It had to hire another company to complete the job. Complicating the matter is that Country filed a notice of intent to hold a mechanic’s lien on Westside’s property in the amount of the total owed to the subcontractors.

Westside sued, alleging breach of contract and slander of title, and it requested piercing of the corporate veil to hold the Songers personally liable.

The trial court ruled in favor of Westside and against Country and the Songers personally, awarding $117,000 in damages, which consisted of costs to complete the project, prejudgment interest, attorney fees and damages for delay of the project caused by Country’s breach.

In Country Contractors, Inc., Stephen Songer, and Jahn Songer v. A Westside Storage of Indianapolis, Inc., 32A01-1304-CC-155, the Court of Appeals reversed the piercing of the corporate veil, finding that the Songers did not use the corporation to engage in misconduct to their own benefit. Westside also failed to establish that Country’s dwindling capital was due to anything other than a general downturn in the economy or construction industry, Judge Terry Crone wrote.

Crone also noted that lack of recourse because Country is now bankrupt is “simply not a proper basis for piercing the corporate veil.”

The judges affirmed the slander of title finding with respect to Country, however. When Country filed its lien claim, both the subcontractors’ lien claims and the release of lien based on Westside’s direct payment to the subcontractors were on file in the county records. As such, Country had constructive notice of those entries, and its filing of an invalid lien claim constitutes evidence sufficient to support the finding that it slandered Westside’s title.

The $17,500 in attorney fees award is reasonable, but the COA remanded for further proceedings regarding delay damages and prejudgment interest because the nearly $34,000 amount adopted by the trial court was speculative.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The ADA acts as a tax upon all for the benefit of a few. And, most importantly, the many have no individual say in whether they pay the tax. Those with handicaps suffered in military service should get a pass, but those who are handicapped by accident or birth do NOT deserve that pass. The drivel about "equal access" is spurious because the handicapped HAVE equal access, they just can't effectively use it. That is their problem, not society's. The burden to remediate should be that of those who seek the benefit of some social, constructional, or dimensional change, NOT society generally. Everybody wants to socialize the costs and concentrate the benefits of government intrusion so that they benefit and largely avoid the costs. This simply maintains the constant push to the slop trough, and explains, in part, why the nation is 20 trillion dollars in the hole.

  2. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  3. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  4. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  5. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

ADVERTISEMENT