The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed that the owner of a car involved in a fatal accident must pay storage fees to a towing
company, but those fees must be capped at $1,500.
In Northwest
Towing & Recovery v. State of Indiana, No. 18A02-0905-CV-409, Northwest Towing & Recovery appealed the denial
of its motion to correct error after the trial court capped its storage-fee lien at $1,500 based on Indiana Code Section 32-33-10-5(b).
The company had the lien against Frances Brinkley, the owner of the car involved in a fatal accident caused by her son.
Brinkley cross-appealed arguing she shouldn't have had to pay anything to have her car returned.
The accident happened Oct. 8, 2006, and Northwest - based on a contract with the city of Muncie - towed the vehicle and stored
it at a rate of $20 a day. The car remained in storage until the court ordered on Oct. 28, 2008, that the car be returned
to Brinkley.
The trial court concluded Brinkley should be responsible for storage from the time of her son's sentencing in August
2007 until the car was released, but because of the statutory cap, she would only have to pay $1,500, plus other miscellaneous
costs totaling $250.
Northwest argued the trial court order can't stand because Brinkley wasn't a party to the criminal proceedings, violating
Indiana Trial Rule 17(A). The Court of Appeals decided that Northwest waived the issue because it invited the alleged error
and never objected under Trial Rule 17(A) until the trial court ruled against it, wrote Chief Judge John Baker.
The appellate court also affirmed that I.C. Section 32-33-10-5(b) is applicable and capped the storage costs at $1,500. Northwest
argued that I.C. 9-22-5-15(a) could apply - which has no caps - but that statute is only applicable when work or storage is
done at the request of the owner, wrote the chief judge. Brinkley never requested her car be stored at Northwest - the Muncie
Police Department originally requested it and her son asked for continued storage until his trial so the car could be preserved
for evidence.
To allow Northwest to proceed under I.C. 9-22-5-15(a) "would permit Northwest to proceed with a lien that would effectively
ignore the specific limitations and circumvent the statutory cap that became effective in 2005," wrote Chief Judge Baker.
The Court of Appeals also affirmed the order that Northwest title the car back to Brinkley.
The appellate judges ruled Brinkley should be responsible for the $1,500 in storage fees even though her son caused the fees
to be incurred. She never requested the car returned to her after her son was sentenced, so the trial court could reasonably
infer she permitted the continued storage of the car.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.