Potential plaintiffs who want to join a class action suit seeking redress under the state's Wage Claims Statute must
first submit a claim to the Indiana Department of Labor, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld today.
The ruling comes seven months after another appellate panel ruled in Lemon v. Wishard Health Services, 902 N.E.2d,
297 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009), that anyone who wants to file a lawsuit in court or join a class action suit under the Wage Claims
Statute has to first submit their claim to the DOL. In upholding that decision, the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal
of the proposed class of plaintiffs who haven't sought review and referral from the DOL in Maureen Reel, Thomas Dullen,
and Ned Milby, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Clarian Health Partners Inc., No. 49A02-0901-CV-112.
Maureen Reel, Thomas Dullen, and Ned Milby filed their complaints under the Wage Claims Statute against Clarian Health Partners
on behalf of themselves and all others who were paid their paid time off (PTO) wages on or after July 11, 2003. Their suit
claimed Clarian paid out the PTO after the pay date for the pay period in which they were involuntarily separated, which would
violate the Wage Claims Statute.
Clarian was initially granted summary judgment on the claims, but the appellate court reversed with respect to Reel, Dullen,
and Milby. Those three had initially submitted their claim to the DOL.
The trial court did grant summary judgment to Clarian in a separate ruling in regards to the class claims. The named plaintiffs
argued on appeal that despite the ruling in Lemon, in which transfer was pending at the time they filed their brief,
but was denied by the time Clarian filed its brief, the members of the proposed class action weren't required to file
their wage claims with the DOL in order to join the suit.
Under the Wage Claims Statute, the wage claims must first be submitted to the DOL, which may then refer the claims to the
attorney general, who may initiate civil actions or refer the claim to an attorney. To become the "designee" of
the attorney general, the claimant must first obtain a letter of referral before filing suit, wrote Judge Nancy Vaidik.
The Court of Appeals also affirmed the trial court didn't abuse its discretion in sequencing the discovery to avoid extensive
and costly discovery until it ruled on the motion to dismiss.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...