More than 7,000 attorneys in 19 central Indiana counties can now vote for one colleague they’d like to see join the
Indiana Judicial Nominating and Qualifications commissions.
The Indiana Appellate Clerk’s Office mailed ballots and biographies Oct. 12 to attorneys’ homes, and those lawyers
have until 4 p.m. Nov. 10 to return ballots. The returned ballots will be counted at 10 a.m. Nov. 12 to determine who fills
the vacancy for one spot on the seven-member panel that’s chaired by Indiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard and includes
three lawyers chosen by colleagues and three non-attorneys appointed by the governor. Indianapolis attorney John Trimble completes
his three-year term at year’s end and five lawyers are running for the job.
Applying for the post in the 2nd judicial district for the 2011-2013 term are:
• Jan M. Carroll, a partner at Barnes & Thornburg.
• David R. Hennessy, a solo criminal defense attorney.
• Kathy L. Osborn, a partner at Baker & Daniels.
• Joel Schumm, an attorney and a professor at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis.
• William E. Winingham Jr., a name partner at Wilson Kehoe & Winingham.
The district is made up of Adams, Blackford, Carroll, Cass, Clinton, Delaware, Grant, Hamilton, Howard, Huntington, Jay,
Madison, Marion, Miami, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Wabash, Wells, and White counties. But whoever is chosen to start in January 2011
will have statewide impact on how judicial discipline and qualifications issues are tackled by the commissions.
Click here to read each of the five nominees’ responses to questions from Indiana
Lawyer .•














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.