ILNews

IBA: Committee stresses civility, member outreach

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


Mentoring and assisting lawyers of all ages and experiences are among the goals of the 2010 IBA Standing Committee on Professionalism, according to the 2010 committee chairs, Hon. William T. Lawrence, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, and Kathleen I. Hart, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP.

The outreach is geared toward promoting civility inside and outside the legal community. Among the committee's efforts this year will be to co-host the second Mentors Who Matter Luncheon, which was begun last year to foster and recognize mentoring relationships.

The committee also will be focusing this year on lawyers in transition, an effort that was begun in 2009 under the direction of then co-chairs Hon. Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, and Sally Zweig, Katz & Korin PC.

A packet of information about starting a law practice was compiled by the committee for lawyers who have recently found their careers in transition; it is available at www.indybar.org by clicking on Professionalism.

Additional outreach to lawyers in transition may include a resume database hosted by the IBA and other programming to assist lawyers who have changed the nature of their practice or pursued non-traditional careers.

In addition, the committee will continue a feature in the IBA's newsletter pages in the Indiana Lawyer newspaper called "Nod to Professionalism," aimed at recognizing lawyers for their commitment to the IBA's standards of professionalism. The standards denote five categories: commitment, character, competence, courtesy in client advocacy and community service.

Zweig is joined on the 2010 committee by: Jerry A. Barr, Krieg DeVault LLP; A. Richard M. Blaiklock, Lewis Wagner LLP; Sonia S. Chen, Bingham McHale LLP; James Dimos, Frost Brown Todd LLP; William M. "Terry" Horne, Attorney at Law; Ann Carr Mackey, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP; Patrick W. Price, Barnes & Thornburg LLP; Roberta Sabin Recker, Baker & Daniels LLP; Gary Roberts, Dean of the Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis; Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen & Malad LLP; and Hon. Gerald S. Zore, Marion Superior Court.

IBA leadership, aided by grants from the Indianapolis Bar Foundation, made a commitment several years ago to reduce imagerelated barriers that may keep some from obtaining legal advice and/or create distance in attorneyclient relationships, and to promote professionalism and civility in lawyer-to-lawyer relationships. A professionalism coordinator was appointed by the IBA board and later the effort was assigned to a standing committee.

The IBA's professionalism accomplishments were recognized in 2007 by the American Bar Association with the E. Smythe Gambrell Professionalism Award. Among them are the creation of the Bar Leader Series; re-affirming, printing and distributing the Tenets of Professional Courtesy, now called the Standards of Professionalism; development of the Applied Professionalism Course; various course offerings to law students and attorneys, such as "Surviving and Thriving in the Practice of Law"; and presenting an annual report on professionalism to the Indianapolis Bar Association's board of directors.

An annual IBA Professionalism Award also was established in 2004 to recognize exceptional meritorious achievement by an attorney or judge widely accepted by his or her peers as having consistently modeled the spirit of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct.

Watch for more information to come soon on professionalism programs. If you have any suggestions for the professionalism committee, e-mail iba@indybar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.

ADVERTISEMENT