ILNews

IBA: Committee stresses civility, member outreach

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


Mentoring and assisting lawyers of all ages and experiences are among the goals of the 2010 IBA Standing Committee on Professionalism, according to the 2010 committee chairs, Hon. William T. Lawrence, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, and Kathleen I. Hart, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP.

The outreach is geared toward promoting civility inside and outside the legal community. Among the committee's efforts this year will be to co-host the second Mentors Who Matter Luncheon, which was begun last year to foster and recognize mentoring relationships.

The committee also will be focusing this year on lawyers in transition, an effort that was begun in 2009 under the direction of then co-chairs Hon. Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, and Sally Zweig, Katz & Korin PC.

A packet of information about starting a law practice was compiled by the committee for lawyers who have recently found their careers in transition; it is available at www.indybar.org by clicking on Professionalism.

Additional outreach to lawyers in transition may include a resume database hosted by the IBA and other programming to assist lawyers who have changed the nature of their practice or pursued non-traditional careers.

In addition, the committee will continue a feature in the IBA's newsletter pages in the Indiana Lawyer newspaper called "Nod to Professionalism," aimed at recognizing lawyers for their commitment to the IBA's standards of professionalism. The standards denote five categories: commitment, character, competence, courtesy in client advocacy and community service.

Zweig is joined on the 2010 committee by: Jerry A. Barr, Krieg DeVault LLP; A. Richard M. Blaiklock, Lewis Wagner LLP; Sonia S. Chen, Bingham McHale LLP; James Dimos, Frost Brown Todd LLP; William M. "Terry" Horne, Attorney at Law; Ann Carr Mackey, Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP; Patrick W. Price, Barnes & Thornburg LLP; Roberta Sabin Recker, Baker & Daniels LLP; Gary Roberts, Dean of the Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis; Richard E. Shevitz, Cohen & Malad LLP; and Hon. Gerald S. Zore, Marion Superior Court.

IBA leadership, aided by grants from the Indianapolis Bar Foundation, made a commitment several years ago to reduce imagerelated barriers that may keep some from obtaining legal advice and/or create distance in attorneyclient relationships, and to promote professionalism and civility in lawyer-to-lawyer relationships. A professionalism coordinator was appointed by the IBA board and later the effort was assigned to a standing committee.

The IBA's professionalism accomplishments were recognized in 2007 by the American Bar Association with the E. Smythe Gambrell Professionalism Award. Among them are the creation of the Bar Leader Series; re-affirming, printing and distributing the Tenets of Professional Courtesy, now called the Standards of Professionalism; development of the Applied Professionalism Course; various course offerings to law students and attorneys, such as "Surviving and Thriving in the Practice of Law"; and presenting an annual report on professionalism to the Indianapolis Bar Association's board of directors.

An annual IBA Professionalism Award also was established in 2004 to recognize exceptional meritorious achievement by an attorney or judge widely accepted by his or her peers as having consistently modeled the spirit of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct.

Watch for more information to come soon on professionalism programs. If you have any suggestions for the professionalism committee, e-mail iba@indybar.org.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT