ILNews

Conour seeks pre-sentence release

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former attorney William Conour has asked a federal judge who ordered him jailed last month in his wire fraud case to free him ahead of his Oct. 17 sentencing.

Conour pleaded guilty July 15 to government charges that he defrauded at least 25 personal-injury and wrongful-death clients of more than $4.5 million he received in negotiated settlements. He entered a plea a short time after he was jailed in June for dissipating assets in violation of terms of bond. Conour since has been held in the Marion County Jail.

The motion for release filed July 19 asks Chief Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana to free Conour until October because he doesn’t represent a flight risk, and because he has consented to the government taking possession of any assets that may remain from an inventory of his Carmel home.

“Therefore, the risk of dissipation which previously concerned the court will be eliminated as soon as the government takes control of the remaining assets,” public defender Michael Donahoe wrote in the petition.  

The government has not responded to the motion and Young had not acted on the request as of midday Thursday. The motion notes federal prosecutor Jason Bohm opposes the release request.

Donahoe argues that Conour also needs access to his computer, files and records to help enable more assets to go toward restitution and to defend himself in at least six civil cases in which he is a defendant.

Conour also has “health concerns which can best be addressed if he is released prior to sentencing,” according to the motion. Those include access to cholesterol mediation and “completing dermatology treatment for removal of cancerous and pre-cancerous lesions.”

The motion also states that Conour’s 25-room house on Sedgemoore Circle, currently subject to a foreclosure action, is exposed because of his absence. The motion says its vacancy “will cause a lapse in homeowners insurance coverage and renders the house vulnerable to vandalism and other potential damage by animals, fire, etc. In fact, during a prior period of vacancy the residence suffered extensive damage by squirrels and raccoons.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • FELON USE JAIL STAY TO PREPARE FOR PRISON!
    Squirrels and raccoons have more possessory rights to the mansion than Conour and will do less damage. Conour should use his jail time to prepare for the fun he will have in the prison's general population where he likely will be properly treated as the lord he thinks he is. Didn't Conour's sabbatical at the Scottish thological seminar prepare him for everything? Perhaps he doesn't feel well thinking about Cù Sìth or the Grim Reaper whose scythe can remedy a few skin problems.
  • Ridiculous motion
    If Conour robbed a bank of $4.5M and pled guilty, would the court set him free so he could go to his dermatologist and pick up his meds from CVS? Squirrels and lapsed home insurance? It’s not his house! His motion also states he needs to pack his ‘personal’ things, take care of personal affairs, and that incarceration will cause his Medicare to lapse. And the court should be sympathetic…why? All of this could have been taken care of during the long period of appeals he filed throughout the past year, extending the wait to trial. And what was he doing instead? He was spending victim restitution funds and proceeds from the sale of assets on himself. I suggest the judge give him another twenty for filing frivolous motions and wasting the time of the court.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT