ILNews

Conour victims number 33, court filing reveals

Dave Stafford
September 18, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A defense request for more time to object to a presentence investigation report discloses that the number of victims of former leading personal-injury attorney William Conour is 33, more than the number the government has previously alleged.

Conour is awaiting sentencing in federal court on Oct. 17. He has been jailed since June 27 on a wire fraud charge based on information that alleged he defrauded at least 25 victims of more than $4.5 million. He pleaded guilty a few days after he was ordered jailed for dissipating assets without court approval.

Conour’s public defenders, Michael Donahoe and Joseph M. Cleary, on Wednesday asked the court for more time to respond to the confidential presentence investigation report received Sept. 5. The filing indicates prosecutors have no objection to the request.

Objections to the report are scheduled to be submitted by Sept. 23, according to rules of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

“Counsel cannot comply with the time line for objections,” according to the filing. “There are approximately 33 individual victims, each one reflecting a separate personal injury case. These cases were litigated over a period of ten years. In order to accurately ascertain the loss amount it is necessary to review each case and determine the amount of expenses advanced by the defendant and the third party liens paid from each settlement. The task of recovering the data necessary to complete this loss analysis will require an additional two weeks.”

Southern District Chief Judge Richard Young has not yet ruled on the request.

Conour faces a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of as much as $250,000.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Can I get this form on line,if not where can I obtain one. I am eligible.

  2. What a fine example of the best of the Hoosier tradition! How sad that the AP has to include partisan snark in the obit for this great American patriot and adventurer.

  3. Why are all these lawyers yakking to the media about pending matters? Trial by media? What the devil happened to not making extrajudicial statements? The system is falling apart.

  4. It is a sad story indeed as this couple has been only in survival mode, NOT found guilty with Ponzi, shaken down for 5 years and pursued by prosecution that has been ignited by a civil suit with very deep pockets wrenched in their bitterness...It has been said that many of us are breaking an average of 300 federal laws a day without even knowing it. Structuring laws, & civilForfeiture laws are among the scariest that need to be restructured or repealed . These laws were initially created for drug Lords and laundering money and now reach over that line. Here you have a couple that took out their own money, not drug money, not laundering. Yes...Many upset that they lost money...but how much did they make before it all fell apart? No one ask that question? A civil suit against Williams was awarded because he has no more money to fight...they pushed for a break in order...they took all his belongings...even underwear, shoes and clothes? who does that? What allows that? Maybe if you had the picture of him purchasing a jacket at the Goodwill just to go to court the next day...his enemy may be satisfied? But not likely...bitterness is a master. For happy ending lovers, you will be happy to know they have a faith that has changed their world and a solid love that many of us can only dream about. They will spend their time in federal jail for taking their money from their account, but at the end of the day they have loyal friends, a true love and a hope of a new life in time...and none of that can be bought or taken That is the real story.

  5. Could be his email did something especially heinous, really over the top like questioning Ind S.Ct. officials or accusing JLAP of being the political correctness police.

ADVERTISEMENT