DTCI: Corporate, in-house counsel tell why they belong to DTCI

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

kevin tyra DTCIAs Membership Chair of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana, I have encouraged all corporate and in-house counsel to join DTCI. I am turning over this column to two in-house friends and colleagues: Michele Calderon Johns, vice president and chief risk officer at Indiana University Health; and Kayla Goodfellow, staff defense counsel at Cincinnati Insurance.

Why did you join DTCI?

Michele: At the time I joined, I was with a firm that had a strong health care section and multiple attorneys providing medical professional liability defense. We all saw the immediate value of professional development, networking with like-minded folks, the opportunity to push ourselves to present new or developing topics, as well as a chance to lead the health care section. Quite frankly, DTCI provided an opportunity and safe harbor to share ideas, ask for help, and tell war stories and precautionary tales.

Kayla: Because someone who knew more than I did told me to.

How do you benefit (particularly as in-house counsel) from membership in DTCI?

Michele: When I left private practice to become in-house counsel, I continued my DTCI membership. As our in-house department has grown, all of our litigation attorneys are encouraged to participate in DTCI. We are fortunate in getting to hire outside counsel to assist with defense of litigation matters. When selecting outside defense counsel, those who have a strong commitment to the defense bar and have shared their time and knowledge with DTCI over the years come to the forefront in our selection process. At this point in my career, many of my duties take me further away from the courtroom and management of litigation. I probably value my relationship with DTCI and its members even more, as it is a link to the sharp edge of the practice, the trends, the new ideas and innovations, and yes, the next generation of stellar defense counsel, as we have to be doing some succession planning!

Kayla: I believe the greatest benefit is the community DTCI creates. It creates a whole group of resources. And it familiarizes you with the other attorneys with whom you will inevitably litigate. When attorneys know each other through organizations like DTCI, it gives litigation a cooperative tone from the get-go.

Please describe a memory of a DTCI event you particularly enjoyed or found helpful.

Michele: The ethics offerings of the last several years’ annual conferences are not only helpful with meeting CLE requirements but have actually been very thoughtful and enlightening. Watching a Court of Appeals argument. Listening to a physician who was a defendant in a medical malpractice lawsuit talk about how it affected him, his practice, his family and his community. But the best memories are actually those during cocktails or dinner, in sharing stories and ideas with esteemed colleagues.

Kayla: Several years ago, I attended the Rookie Seminar. It was a relief to be in a room with other young attorneys who were trying to make it through the same learning curve as me.

What would you say to an in-house or corporate counsel as to why they should join, and be active in, DTCI?

Michele: It is very easy to become isolated within your own organization, and depending upon the size of your legal team, you may become isolated in your legal thinking. We are smarter together. DTCI provides the exposure to diversity of thought and environmental assessments of what is going on in the “outside” world. Plus, the fellowship and friendship of other attorneys who are fighting the same battles daily, and have wisdom and experience to share, is invaluable no matter where one practices.

Kayla: In-house counsel are frequently handling cases on their own, without the hierarchy of a traditional firm. That comes with a lot of responsibility. It is an absolute necessity to stay up to speed with developments in the law. It also means your trial skills have to stay sharp. DTCI seminars are helpful with both of those things.

Final thoughts

To all corporate counsel and in-house counsel (as well as all defense trial counsel): Please consider joining DTCI if you are not already a member and attending DTCI programming, starting with the 50th anniversary annual conference in November. There are many demands on your time and money, but this would be one of the best investments you will make. For more information, please contact our executive director, Lisa Mortier, at or 317-580-1233, for more information.•


Kevin C. Tyra is a director of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana and the principal of The Tyra Law Firm P.C. in Indianapolis. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  2. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

  3. We are a Finance Industry Company professionals with over 15 Years Experience and a focus on providing Bank Guarantee and Standby Letter of Credit from some of the World Top 25 Prime Banks primarily from Barclays, Deutsche Bank, HSBC,Credit Suisse e.t.c. FEATURES: Amounts from $1 million to 5 Billion+ Euro’s or US Dollars Great Attorney Trust Account Protection Delivered via MT760, MT799 and MT103 Swift with Full Bank Responsibility Brokers Always Protected Purchase Instrument of BG/SBLC : 32%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Lease Instrument of BG/SBLC : 4%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Interested Agents/Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. We Facilitate Bank instruments SBLC for Lease and Purchase. Whether you are a new startup, medium or large establishment that needs a financial solution to fund/get your project off the ground or business looking for extra capital to expand your operation,our company renders credible and trusted bank guarantee provider who are willing to fund and give financing solutions that suits your specific business needs. We help you secure and issue sblc and bank guarantee for your trade, projects and investment from top AA rated world Banks like HSBC, Barclays, Dutch Ing Bank, Llyods e.t.c because that’s the best and safest strategy for our clients.e.t.c DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS 1. Instrument: Funds backed Bank Guarantee(BG) ICC-600 2. Currency : USD/EURO 3. Age of Issue: Fresh Cut 4. Term: One year and One day 5. Contract Amount: United State Dollars/Euros (Buyers Face Value) 6. Price : Buy:32%+1, Lease: 4%+2 7. Subsequent tranches: To be mutually agreed between both parties 8. Issuing Bank: Top RATED world banks like HSBC, Barclays, ING Dutch Bank, Llyods e.t.c 9. Delivery Term: Pre advise MT199 or MT799 first. Followed By SWIFT MT760 10. Payment Term: MT799 & Settlement via MT103 11. Hard Copy: By Bank Bonded Courier Interested Agents,Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. Name:Richardson McAnthony Contact Mail :

  4. Affordable Loan Offer ( NEED A LOAN?Sometime i really wanna help those in a financial problems.i was wondering why some people talks about inability to get a loan from a bank/company. have you guys ever try Eric Benson lending cost dollars to loan from their company. my aunty from USA,just got a home loan from Eric Benson Lending banking card service.and they gave her a loan of 8,000,000 USD. they give out loan from 100,000 USD - 100,000,000 USD. try it yourself and testimony. have a great day as you try.Kiss & Hug. Contact E-mail:

  5. From the article's fourth paragraph: "Her work underscores the blurry lines in Russia between the government and businesses . . ." Obviously, the author of this piece doesn't pay much attention to the "blurry lines" between government and businesses that exist in the United States. And I'm not talking only about Trump's alleged conflicts of interest. When lobbyists for major industries (pharmaceutical, petroleum, insurance, etc) have greater access to this country's elected representatives than do everyday individuals (i.e., voters), then I would say that the lines between government and business in the United States are just as blurry, if not more so, than in Russia.