Anyone who danced in the past three years at one Indianapolis strip club embroiled in a lawsuit over minimum wage may be
able to collect on unpaid wages, ruled a District Court judge Wednesday.
Southern District Judge William Lawrence granted a motion for notice to potential plaintiffs and certified the matter as
a collective action in Wendi R. Morse and Felicia Kay Pennington, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated
v. M E R Corp. d/b/a Dancers Showclub, No. 1:08-cv-1389.
Dancers Wendi R. Morse and Felicia Kay Pennington filed the suit in October 2008 alleging the club failed to pay them and
others similarly situated in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act. They no longer worked at the club when they filed
the suit but had worked there within the past three years.
The plaintiffs argued Dancers Showclub incorrectly classified dancers as independent contractors instead of employees and
failed to pay them minimum wage. The suit also claims Dancers Showclub required the women to pay a percentage of their tips
to the club and other employees who don't customarily receive tips, violating 29 U.S.C. Section 203(m).
Dancers don't receive any wages or other compensation from the club and they aren't allowed to dance at any other
exotic clubs while working at Dancers Showclub. The suit also states the club sets the hours, shifts, and minimum tips the
dancers are required to get each shift.
The plaintiffs want the club to repay back wages in addition to wages equal to the amount they had to tip-out to the club
and other employees, as well as liquidated damages equal in amount to the unpaid compensation and tips found due to the dancers.
Judge Lawrence certified the suit as a collective action, ordering Dancers Showclub to produce the names and other employee
information of all the current and former dancers at the club from the previous three years as of the date of the order. The
judge ordered Dancers Showclub to produce the information by Jan. 18 and required the notice to potential plaintiffs and consent
to join form be mailed within 7 days from that date. Potential plaintiffs have 60 days from that point to opt-in the litigation.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...