A Delaware County Commissioner has been publicly admonished for his conduct after receiving a parking ticket in February
2009.
Commissioner Brian M. Pierce, who serves as the Delaware Circuit Juvenile Commissioner, admitted to violating Rules 1.2 and
1.3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
He received a parking ticket for parking in the wrong direction. He saw the City of Muncie code enforcement officer ticketing
his car and argued against it because he was a court commissioner and juvenile court judge. Commissioner Pierce later called
the city's Board of Public Works and Safety complaining about the ticket and suggested he would subpoena the secretary
and code enforcement officer to explain the situation. Commissioner Pierce also spoke to the deputy mayor and mayor - often
using profanity during the conversation - to contest the ticket. He paid the ticket 10 days later.
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualification's decision to issue the public admonition instead of filing formal charges was partly influenced by the fact the Delaware County
Board of Judges already sanctioned Commissioner Pierce to a 2-week suspension without pay for his misconduct.
"Although the Commission views judicial abuse of the prestige of office, or even the appearance of such impropriety,
as a very serious violation, the Commission determined that this matter should be concluded with a Public Admonition, in light
of the Delaware County Board of Judges' immediate and appropriate response and Commissioner Pierce's acceptance of
that discipline," according to the public admonishment.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!