Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard will be busy next week accepting two awards, one for the court's
"Why Lincoln Was a Lawyer" program and one for jury-system improvements.
The Indiana Historical Society will recognize the Supreme Court's educational outreach program, Courts in the Classroom,
with its 2009 Indiana History Outstanding Project Award. The chief justice will accept the award at the society's Founders
Day Dinner Dec. 7.
"To be recognized by the Indiana Historical Society is a great honor," Chief Justice Shepard told Indiana Lawyer
in an e-mail. "They are devoted to helping Hoosiers gain a better understanding of our state history. So to have a project
that stands out in their minds is really an accomplishment."
"Why Lincoln Was a Lawyer" was an effort of the Supreme Court and Indiana State Bar Association to educate students
about Abraham Lincoln's life as a lawyer, Hoosier, and president. The same program was recently recognized by the American
Bar Association with its 2009 Law Day Outstanding Activity awards.
"I had high expectations that teachers and students would enjoy the Lincoln program. However, I did not expect to receive
so many letters of thanks from judges and attorneys who participated in the program," Chief Justice Shepard said. "Many
of the attorneys and judges who participated sent us photographs and thank-you notes that they received from the classrooms
where they spoke. I could not have been more pleased with how the program turned out and with the Indiana State Bar Association's
partnership."
The Indiana Supreme Court's Judicial Technology and Automation Committee will also be honored by the National Center
for State Courts as a recipient of the 2009 G. Thomas Munsterman Award for Jury Innovations. The award recognizes the collaborative
efforts of the Supreme Court, Department of Revenue, and Bureau of Motor Vehicles to ensure a broader and more accurate jury
system that includes the compilation and distribution of a statewide master jury pool list.
"Having a jury resolve a dispute is a cornerstone to our system of justice. With the technology upgrades to the jury
list, we are really using 21st century technology to accomplish one of the most fundamental requirements of our democracy,"
the chief justice said.
JTAC makes the master jury list available to all Indiana trial courts through a secure Web site, which allows jury administrators
to access the lists as they need.
Chief Justice Shepard and Gov. Mitch Daniels will accept the award at the Indiana Judicial Center's winter conference
Dec. 11. The two will speak about the importance of Indiana's statewide master jury pool list and other court technology
projects.
The chief justice said he is pleased that Gov. Daniels will attend the conference to share in the award because partnering
with his administration is one of the main reasons the project is a success.
"We are so pleased with this new electronic method created by our Judicial Technology and Automation Committee. It's
just another example of the many projects we are working on devoted to improving court technology," said Chief Justice
Shepard.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.