Marion Superior Courts have fully implemented e-filing for civil collections and mortgage foreclosure cases, but law firms
and attorneys are not en masse embracing the change that’s currently a voluntary choice.
Launched in May, the e-filing program being managed by LexisNexis File & Serve has seen about 6,103 total MF and CC cases
filed as of the four-month mark Sept. 17, and 995 of those – or 16.3 percent – have been e-filed. Court administration
estimates that about 1,900 cases will have been e-filed by year’s end.
But the court hopes that more attorneys and law firms will get involved, and court administrators say they are encouraged
by the Indianapolis Bar Association’s enthusiasm about the project and free training being offered. Though the system
is currently optional, those leading the Marion Superior project say it will likely become mandatory at some point.
This e-filing project is similar to one that also began earlier this year in Lake County, though that one involves an internally
created court system. Similar systems have been implemented on a statewide basis in places like Colorado and Delaware, which
have implemented either voluntary or mandatory e-filing.
The Indiana Supreme Court had approved local rules earlier this year allowing for the Marion Superior e-filing project. Those
rules can be found at www.in.gov/judiciary/marion/docs/efiling021910.pdf.
Rehearing "2 county court systems get e-filing approval" IL March 31-April 13, 2010














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.