ILNews

Court video online raises call for blanket cellphone policy

Dave Stafford
February 21, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another recent incident of video streamed online that could compromise criminal courts has led judges in Marion County to consider a blanket policy restricting cellphone use in courtrooms.

Marion Superior Criminal Division 20 Judge Steven Eichholtz on Friday told the courts’ executive committee that recurring incidents of court sessions being recorded and posted online and other problems should be met with a unified policy for all courts in the City-County Building.

Judges have expressed similar concerns before, and Eichholtz said he was recently informed of another incident in which court proceedings wound up online. He said he’s also aware of photos of confidential informants and jurors that have been posted on social media.

“If this stuff continues, it’s a danger to the public,” he said.

Currently, each judge sets policy for his or her own courtroom, but Eichholtz said a uniform rule is needed. Judges agreed that if the courts spoke with one voice on the issue, it would also publicize any rule that’s approved by the judges of the Marion Superior general term.

Eichholtz said he’s adopted a policy that cellphones can’t be used in court except by attorneys or pro se litigants for court purposes.

Policies vary around the state. In Allen County, for instance, cellphones may not be brought into the courthouse except by attorneys or people authorized to have them. Saint Joseph and Lake counties have similarly restrictive policies.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, now do something about this preverted anacronism

  2. William Hartley prosecutor of Wabash county constantly violates people rights. Withholds statement's, is bias towards certain people. His actions have ruined lives and families. In this county you question him or go out of town for a lawyer,he finds a way to make things worse for you. Unfair,biased and crooked.

  3. why is the State trying to play GOD? Automatic sealing of a record is immoral. People should have the right to decide how to handle a record. the state is playing GOD. I have searched for decades, then you want me to pay someone a huge price to contact my son. THIS is extortion and gestapo control. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW.

  4. I haven't made some of the best choices in the last two years I have been to marion county jail 1 and two on three different occasions each time of release dates I've spent 48 to 72 hours after date of release losing a job being denied my freedom after ordered please help

  5. Out here in Kansas, where I now work as a government attorney, we are nearing the end of a process that could have relevance in this matter: "Senate Bill 45 would allow any adult otherwise able to possess a handgun under state and federal laws to carry that gun concealed as a matter of course without a permit. This move, commonly called constitutional carry, would elevate the state to the same club that Vermont, Arizona, Alaska and Wyoming have joined in the past generation." More reading here: http://www.guns.com/2015/03/18/kansas-house-panel-goes-all-in-on-constitutional-carry-measure/ Time to man up, Hoosiers. (And I do not mean that in a sexist way.)

ADVERTISEMENT