2:30 p.m. No. 64A04-1110-CR-552. Tiery Hall, Indiana State University, Terre Haute. Donald G. Huls appeals his convictions
of Class C felony criminal recklessness and Class D felony criminal recklessness. He argues the prosecutor committed
misconduct when, during trial, the prosecutor allegedly commented on Huls’ failure to testify. Huls also argues
that the trial court erroneously rejected several of his proposed jury instructions. Finally, Huls contends that the
state did not present sufficient evidence to disprove his claim of self-defense.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.