1:30 p.m. 90A05-1109-PL-487. An Indiana trial court ordered an Illinois-resident expert witness retained by plaintiff to sign an authorization to release records related to the expert’s employment at an Illinois hospital. The expert signed the authorization, but the hospital refused to release the records for fear that the expert would sue the hospital if it disclosed the records. Defendant’s counsel moved to compel the expert to execute a release indemnifying the hospital from liability for producing the records to defendant; plaintiff opposed the motion. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to compel the execution of the release. Plaintiff appealed, and defendant moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing this court lacks jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s appeal.
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.