James O. Young v. State of Indiana - 10/22/12

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  October 22, 2012 
10:30 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 20A04-1112-CR-699. Allen Superior Court Courtroom 1. James Young appeals his conviction for Class D felony domestic battery and Class D felony strangulation following a jury trial.  Young’s wife, the victim, did not testify at trial, but two firefighters and a police officer who had spoken with her at or near the time of the incidents involved were allowed to testify concerning the substance of the statements she made to them.
Young presents the following issues for review on appeal: (1) whether the firefighters’ and police officer’s testimony regarding the victim’s statement to them was a violation of the Confrontation Clause within the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States or permissible questioning during an ongoing emergency; (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that the victim’s statement to the police officer, more than 45 minutes after the incidents, was an excited utterance; and (3) whether there was sufficient evidence to prove that Young committed the offenses in a child’s physical presence so as to elevate the domestic battery offense to a Class D felony.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Freedom From Religion Foundation: If you really want to be free from religion, don't go to the Christmas Play or the Christmas Pageant or the Christmas Parade. Anything with "Christ" or Saint...fill in the blank...would be off limits to you. Then leave the rest of us ALONE!

  2. So the prosecutor made an error and the defendants get a full remedy. Just one short paragraph to undo the harm of the erroneous prosecution. Wow. Just wow.

  3. Wake up!!!! Lawyers are useless!! it makes no difference in any way to speak about what is important!! Just dont tell your plans to the "SELFRIGHTEOUS ARROGANT JERKS!! WHO THINK THEY ARE BETTER THAN ANOTHER MAN/WOMAN!!!!!!

  4. Looks like you dont understand Democracy, Civilized Society does not cut a thiefs hands off, becouse now he cant steal or write or feed himself or learn !!! You deserve to be over punished, Many men are mistreated hurt in many ways before a breaking point happens! grow up !!!

  5. It was all that kept us from tyranny. So sad that so few among the elite cared enough to guard the sacred trust. Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law. Sophocles No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor. Theodore Roosevelt That was the ideal ... here is the Hoosier reality: The King can do no wrong. Legal maxim From the Latin 'Rex non potest peccare'. When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal. Richard Nixon