10 a.m. 49A05-1109-PL-470. This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action filed by Thomson against its liability insurers
to obtain insurance coverage for a class action toxic tort case pending in Taiwan. In August 2011, the trial court granted
partial summary judgment in favor of Thomson as to certain coverage issues and certified its order as a final judgment pursuant
to Indiana Trial Rule 56(C). Thomson and the insurers (XL Insurance America, Inc., and Century Indemnity) each filed a notice
of appeal from that order. The insurers subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which essentially challenges the
propriety of the trial court’s certification of its order. Oral argument is being held solely on the insurers’
motion to dismiss.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.