Navee Gulzar v. State of Indiana - 5/16/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  May 16, 2013 
9:00 AM  EST

9 a.m. 20A03-1202-PC-88. Gulzar pled guilty to theft in 2006. In 2011, he petitioned for post-conviction relief on grounds counsel had been ineffective for failing to advise him that one consequence of the guilty plea was his automatic deportation from the United States. The Elkhart Superior Court denied post-conviction relief, and the Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished memorandum decision. Gulzar v. State, 20A03-1202-PC-88, slip op. (Ind. Ct. App. Aug. 7, 2012), trans. pending. Gulzar has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over the appeal, arguing that the Court of Appeals decision conflicts with Segura v. State, 749 N.E.2d 496 (Ind. 2001).

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. by the time anybody gets to such files they will probably have been totally vacuumed anyways. they're pros at this at universities. anything to protect their incomes. Still, a laudable attempt. Let's go for throat though: how about the idea of unionizing football college football players so they can get a fair shake for their work? then if one of the players is a pain in the neck cut them loose instead of protecting them. if that kills the big programs, great, what do they have to do with learning anyways? nada. just another way for universities to rake in the billions even as they skate from paying taxes with their bogus "nonprofit" status.

  2. Um the affidavit from the lawyer is admissible, competent evidence of reasonableness itself. And anybody who had done law work in small claims court would not have blinked at that modest fee. Where do judges come up with this stuff? Somebody is showing a lack of experience and it wasn't the lawyers

  3. My children were taken away a year ago due to drugs, and u struggled to get things on track, and now that I have been passing drug screens for almost 6 months now and not missing visits they have already filed to take my rights away. I need help.....I can't loose my babies. Plz feel free to call if u can help. Sarah at 765-865-7589

  4. Females now rule over every appellate court in Indiana, and from the federal southern district, as well as at the head of many judicial agencies. Give me a break, ladies! Can we men organize guy-only clubs to tell our sob stories about being too sexy for our shirts and not being picked for appellate court openings? Nope, that would be sexist! Ah modernity, such a ball of confusion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRsWdK0PRI

  5. LOL thanks Jennifer, thanks to me for reading, but not reading closely enough! I thought about it after posting and realized such is just what was reported. My bad. NOW ... how about reporting who the attorneys were raking in the Purdue alum dollars?

ADVERTISEMENT