Gayle Fischer v. Michael and Noel Heymann - 3/6/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  March 6, 2013 
1:30 PM  EST

1:30 p.m. 49A02-1204-PL-340. On remand from this court’s decision in Fischer v. Heymann, 943 N.E.2d 896 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), trans. denied, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing to determine the damages the Heymanns owed to Fischer for their 2006 breach of an agreement to purchase Fischer’s condominium.  After finding that Fischer failed to mitigate her damages, the trial court entered a damage award for Fischer in the total amount of $93,972.18.  Both parties appeal the trial court’s award of damages to Fischer.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, now do something about this preverted anacronism

  2. William Hartley prosecutor of Wabash county constantly violates people rights. Withholds statement's, is bias towards certain people. His actions have ruined lives and families. In this county you question him or go out of town for a lawyer,he finds a way to make things worse for you. Unfair,biased and crooked.

  3. why is the State trying to play GOD? Automatic sealing of a record is immoral. People should have the right to decide how to handle a record. the state is playing GOD. I have searched for decades, then you want me to pay someone a huge price to contact my son. THIS is extortion and gestapo control. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW. OPEN THE RECORDS NOW.

  4. I haven't made some of the best choices in the last two years I have been to marion county jail 1 and two on three different occasions each time of release dates I've spent 48 to 72 hours after date of release losing a job being denied my freedom after ordered please help

  5. Out here in Kansas, where I now work as a government attorney, we are nearing the end of a process that could have relevance in this matter: "Senate Bill 45 would allow any adult otherwise able to possess a handgun under state and federal laws to carry that gun concealed as a matter of course without a permit. This move, commonly called constitutional carry, would elevate the state to the same club that Vermont, Arizona, Alaska and Wyoming have joined in the past generation." More reading here: http://www.guns.com/2015/03/18/kansas-house-panel-goes-all-in-on-constitutional-carry-measure/ Time to man up, Hoosiers. (And I do not mean that in a sexist way.)

ADVERTISEMENT