C. B. v. State of Indiana - 4/8/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  April 8, 2013 
11:00 AM  EST

11 a.m. 49A04-1207-JV-379. In March 2012, C.B. was alleged to be a delinquent child for committing what would have been battery if committed by an adult. One month later, the State and C.B. entered into a delinquent child admission agreement whereby the State dismissed the delinquency petition in a different cause for C.B.’s admission in the instant one. Also, if C.B. did not violate the terms of the agreement for 90 days, the State would dismiss the immediate petition. Six days later, C.B. was arrested for battery. A petition was filed for this offense but subsequently dropped. C.B. argued that because the petition had been dropped, the State failed to establish probable cause that she had violated her admission agreement. The State argues that this court lacks jurisdiction, because C.B.’s admission agreement is not a final judgment.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT