Lydia Lanni v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al. - 5/1/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  May 1, 2013 
2:00 PM  EST

2 p.m. 49A05-1208-CT-392. This cause comes before us as a result of a civil tort action filed by Lydia Lanni (Lanni) against the NCAA, the University of Notre Dame, and the United States Fencing Association.  Lanni, a spectator, was struck in the left eye by a fencing sabre causing a severe injury while at a purportedly NCAA sanctioned fencing match at Notre Dame. The questions presented to this court focus solely on the procedural posture of the case with respect to the NCAA’s combined motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and/or motion for summary judgment.  Specifically, in her argument Lanni relies on the interplay between Ind. Trial Rule 12(B)(6) and Ind. Trial Rule 56.  Lanni asserts that the trial court erred by not providing adequate notice that it would treat NCAA’s combined motion as a motion for summary judgment and then refused to give her a “reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56”  See T.R. 12(B).  In a related argument, Lanni asserts that the trial court erred in denying her motion to stay briefing in order to obtain discovery to respond to NCAA’s motion for summary judgment.  Lanni also argues that the trial court erred when it subsequently entered summary judgment in favor of NCAA and denied her request to strike an affidavit, designated by NCAA. 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT