Indiana Horse Racing Commission v. Edmund W. Martin Jr. - 5/8/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  May 8, 2013 
7:00 PM  EST

7 p.m. 49A02-1206-PL-512. Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. Edmund W. Martin was employed by the Indiana Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association in 2010. In November 2010, the Executive Director of the Indiana Horse Racing Commission issued an exclusion notice to Martin prohibiting him from entering any Indiana racing facilities until he obtained a license under Indiana Code section 4-31-61. Martin objected to the notice and administrative proceedings ensued. The administrative law judge determined that Martin was a participant in racing and was required to be licensed. On administrative appeal of the decision, the IHRC affirmed and adopted the ALJ's decision. Martin appealed the administrative order to the Marion Superior Court, and the parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court set aside and vacated the IHRC's order requiring Martin to be licensed. The IHRC now appeals.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. My husband financed a car through Wells Fargo In dec 2007 and in Jan 2012 they took him to court to garnish his wages through a company called autovest llc . Do u think the statue of limitations apply from the day last payment was received or from what should have been the completion of the loan

  2. Andrew, you are a whistleblower against an ideologically corrupt system that is also an old boys network ... Including old gals .... You are a huge threat to them. Thieves, liars, miscreants they understand, identify with, coddle. But whistleblowers must go to the stake. Burn well my friend, burn brightly, tyger.

  3. VSB dismissed the reciprocal discipline based on what Indiana did to me. Here we have an attorney actually breaking ethical rules, dishonest behavior, and only getting a reprimand. I advocated that this supreme court stop discriminating against me and others based on disability, and I am SUSPENDED 180 days. Time to take out the checkbook and stop the arrogant cheating to hurt me and retaliate against my good faith efforts to stop the discrimination of this Court. www.andrewstraw.org www.andrewstraw.net

  4. http://www.andrewstraw.org http://www.andrewstraw.net If another state believes by "Clear and convincing evidence" standard that Indiana's discipline was not valid and dismissed it, it is time for Curtis Hill to advise his clients to get out the checkbook. Discrimination time is over.

  5. Congrats Andrew, your street cred just shot up. As for me ... I am now an administrative law judge in Kansas, commissioned by the Governor to enforce due process rights against overreaching government agents. That after being banished for life from the Indiana bar for attempting to do the same as a mere whistleblowing bar applicant. The myth of one lowly peasant with the constitution does not play well in the Hoosier state. As for what our experiences have in common, I have good reason to believe that the same ADA Coordinator who took you out was working my file since 2007, when the former chief justice hired the same, likely to "take out the politically incorrect trash" like me. My own dealings with that powerful bureaucrat and some rather astounding actions .. actions that would make most state courts blush ... actions blessed in full by the Ind.S.Ct ... here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

ADVERTISEMENT