Indiana Horse Racing Commission v. Edmund W. Martin Jr. - 5/8/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  May 8, 2013 
7:00 PM  EST

7 p.m. 49A02-1206-PL-512. Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. Edmund W. Martin was employed by the Indiana Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association in 2010. In November 2010, the Executive Director of the Indiana Horse Racing Commission issued an exclusion notice to Martin prohibiting him from entering any Indiana racing facilities until he obtained a license under Indiana Code section 4-31-61. Martin objected to the notice and administrative proceedings ensued. The administrative law judge determined that Martin was a participant in racing and was required to be licensed. On administrative appeal of the decision, the IHRC affirmed and adopted the ALJ's decision. Martin appealed the administrative order to the Marion Superior Court, and the parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court set aside and vacated the IHRC's order requiring Martin to be licensed. The IHRC now appeals.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT