Cain Family Trust v. Schrader Real Estate & Auction Co. - 5/13/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  May 13, 2013 
1:30 PM  EST

1:30 p.m. 57A03-1209-PL-394. The Cain Family Farm, L.P., and the Cain Family Farm, LLC, (collectively “Cain Family Farm”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Charles O. Drerup and Antlers Ridge, LLC, (collectively “Antlers Ridge”) on Cain Family Farm’s  complaint seeking to stop the transfer of real property owned by Cain Family Farm to Antlers Ridge.  Cain Family Farm presents the following issues for review on appeal:  whether the transfer of the subject real property constituted “the carrying on in the usual way the business” of Cain Family Farm under Indiana Code Section 23-18-3-1.1(b); whether there exist genuine issues of material fact regarding Candace Somerlott’s authority to bind Cain Family Farm when she executed a purchase agreement purporting to transfer the real property; and whether the purchase agreement precludes specific performance as a remedy available to Antlers Ridge

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT