Ignacio Perez v. State of Indiana - 10/24/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  October 24, 2013 
9:00 AM  EST

9 a.m. 20A03-1206-CR-247. Police had identified Perez as the owner of a white truck involved in sales of cocaine, and they went to his house to investigate. Perez stepped out onto the porch to speak with the officers. As events unfolded, Perez gave untruthful answers, screamed something in Spanish to his wife who was at the front door, and was nervous, agitated, and belligerent; he “chest bumped” an officer while trying to get back into his house and he resisted attempts to arrest him. Once Perez was arrested and handcuffed, police found cash from a controlled cocaine buy in his pocket. A police dog then conducted a “sniff” of Perez’s front door, and alerted to the presence of illegal drugs. Police obtained a search warrant for the house and discovered more than eighty grams of cocaine. The Elkhart Superior Court denied Perez’s motion to suppress the evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Perez v. State, 981 N.E.2d 1242 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). Perez has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over the appeal, arguing that the “dog sniff” was illegal and that officers have no right to encounter and stop a defendant on his own property.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Sociologist of religion Peter Berger once said that the US is a “nation of Indians ruled by Swedes.” He meant an irreligious elite ruling a religious people, as that Sweden is the world’s least religious country and India the most religious. The idea is that American social elites tend to be much less religious than just about everyone else in the country. If this is true, it helps explain the controversy raking Indiana over Hollywood, San Fran, NYC, academia and downtown Indy hot coals. Nevermind logic, nevermind it is just the 1993 fed bill did, forget the Founders, abandon of historic dedication to religious liberty. The Swedes rule. You cannot argue with elitists. They have the power, they will use the power, sit down and shut up or feel the power. I know firsthand, having been dealt blows from the elite's high and mighty hands often as a mere religious plebe.

  2. I need helping gaining custody of my 5 and 1 year old from my alcoholic girlfriend. This should be an easy case for any lawyer to win... I've just never had the courage to take her that far. She has a record of public intox and other things. She has no job and no where to live othe than with me. But after 5 years of trying to help her with her bad habit, she has put our kids in danger by driving after drinking with them... She got detained yesterday and the police chief released my kids to me from the police station. I live paycheck to paycheck and Im under alot of stress dealing with this situation. Can anyone please help?

  3. The more a state tries to force people to associate, who don't like each other and simply want to lead separate lives, the more that state invalidates itself....... This conflict has shown clearly that the advocates of "tolerance" are themselves intolerant, the advocates of "diversity" intend to inflict themselves on an unwilling majority by force if necessary, until that people complies and relents and allows itself to be made homogenous with the politically correct preferences of the diversity-lobbies. Let's clearly understand, this is force versus force and democracy has nothing to do with this. Democracy is a false god in the first place, even if it is a valid ideal for politics, but it is becoming ever more just an empty slogan that just suckers a bunch of cattle into paying their taxes and volunteering for stupid wars.

  4. I would like to discuss a commercial litigation case. If you handle such cases, respond for more details.

  5. Great analysis, Elizabeth. Thank you for demonstrating that abortion leads, in logic and acceptance of practice, directly to infanticide. Women of the world unite, you have only your offspring to lose!

ADVERTISEMENT