Aaron L. Anderson, III v. State of Indiana - 11/7/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  November 7, 2013 
9:00 AM  EST

9 a.m. 29A02-1208-CR-694. When a police officer initiated a traffic stop, Anderson opened the door and ran. He was found hiding in a backyard shed. A woman standing on her back deck, had seen Anderson run by and heard a “thump, thump, thump.” Anderson told police he had thrown out a bag of marijuana; jail officials found marijuana on him when he was searched at the jail. Approximately an hour later, the woman saw a firearm in a pile of snow on her deck. Following a jury trial, Anderson was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, a Class B felony, and other offenses. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Anderson v. State, No. 29A02-1208-CR-694 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 4, 2013) (NFP mem. dec.), trans. pending. Anderson has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over the appeal on grounds the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Based on several recent Indy Star articles, I would agree that being a case worker would be really hard. You would see the worst of humanity on a daily basis; and when things go wrong guess who gets blamed??!! Not biological parent!! Best of luck to those who entered that line of work.

  2. I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . dfkcfdkdgbekdffe

  3. Don't believe me, listen to Pacino: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bC9w9cH-M

  4. Law school is social control the goal to produce a social product. As such it began after the Revolution and has nearly ruined us to this day: "“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States which is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. Hence all parties are obliged to borrow, in their daily controversies, the ideas, and even the language, peculiar to judicial proceedings. As most public men [i.e., politicians] are, or have been, legal practitioners, they introduce the customs and technicalities of their profession into the management of public affairs. The jury extends this habitude to all classes. The language of the law thus becomes, in some measure, a vulgar tongue; the spirit of the law, which is produced in the schools and courts of justice, gradually penetrates beyond their walls into the bosom of society, where it descends to the lowest classes, so that at last the whole people contract the habits and the tastes of the judicial magistrate.” ? Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

  5. Attorney? Really? Or is it former attorney? Status with the Ind St Ct? Status with federal court, with SCOTUS? This is a legal newspaper, or should I look elsewhere?

ADVERTISEMENT