Martha Ferguson, et al. v. Berton O'Bryan - 7/24/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  July 24, 2013 
10:30 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 49A02-1211-CT-917. In 2005, Attorney Berton O’Bryan assisted Mary Linder in drafting and executing a will.  The will made reference to a list of specific bequests, which Linder would update from time to time and keep with the will, and provided that the personal representative of Linder’s estate should honor the list as if it were set forth in the will.  O’Bryan provided Linder with blank sheets upon which to record these specific bequests, and the sheets contained neither instructions nor designated spots for the bequests to be signed and witnessed.  Upon Linder’s death, the will and completed list were discovered and admitted to probate, but the list was declared invalid.  Thereafter, a group of Linder’s relatives who had been named in the list brought a legal malpractice action against O’Bryan alleging that he had been negligent in advising Linder and drafting the will.  O’Bryan successfully moved for summary judgment on the basis that he owed no duty to the relatives because they were neither his clients nor known third-party beneficiaries.  The relatives now appeal.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. This is ridiculous. Most JDs not practicing law don't know squat to justify calling themselves a lawyer. Maybe they should try visiting the inside of a courtroom before they go around calling themselves lawyers. This kind of promotional BS just increases the volume of people with JDs that are underqualified thereby dragging all the rest of us down likewise.

  2. I think it is safe to say that those Hoosier's with the most confidence in the Indiana judicial system are those Hoosier's who have never had the displeasure of dealing with the Hoosier court system.

  3. I have an open CHINS case I failed a urine screen I have since got clean completed IOP classes now in after care passed home inspection my x sister in law has my children I still don't even have unsupervised when I have been clean for over 4 months my x sister wants to keep the lids for good n has my case working with her I just discovered n have proof that at one of my hearing dcs case worker stated in court to the judge that a screen was dirty which caused me not to have unsupervised this was at the beginning two weeks after my initial screen I thought the weed could have still been in my system was upset because they were suppose to check levels n see if it was going down since this was only a few weeks after initial instead they said dirty I recently requested all of my screens from redwood because I take prescriptions that will show up n I was having my doctor look at levels to verify that matched what I was prescripted because dcs case worker accused me of abuseing when I got my screens I found out that screen I took that dcs case worker stated in court to judge that caused me to not get granted unsupervised was actually negative what can I do about this this is a serious issue saying a parent failed a screen in court to judge when they didn't please advise

  4. I have a degree at law, recent MS in regulatory studies. Licensed in KS, admitted b4 S& 7th circuit, but not to Indiana bar due to political correctness. Blacklisted, nearly unemployable due to hostile state action. Big Idea: Headwinds can overcome, esp for those not within the contours of the bell curve, the Lego Movie happiness set forth above. That said, even without the blacklisting for holding ideas unacceptable to the Glorious State, I think the idea presented above that a law degree open many vistas other than being a galley slave to elitist lawyers is pretty much laughable. (Did the law professors of Indiana pay for this to be published?)

  5. Joe, you might want to do some reading on the fate of Hoosier whistleblowers before you get your expectations raised up.