Martha Ferguson, et al. v. Berton O'Bryan - 7/24/13

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  July 24, 2013 
10:30 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 49A02-1211-CT-917. In 2005, Attorney Berton O’Bryan assisted Mary Linder in drafting and executing a will.  The will made reference to a list of specific bequests, which Linder would update from time to time and keep with the will, and provided that the personal representative of Linder’s estate should honor the list as if it were set forth in the will.  O’Bryan provided Linder with blank sheets upon which to record these specific bequests, and the sheets contained neither instructions nor designated spots for the bequests to be signed and witnessed.  Upon Linder’s death, the will and completed list were discovered and admitted to probate, but the list was declared invalid.  Thereafter, a group of Linder’s relatives who had been named in the list brought a legal malpractice action against O’Bryan alleging that he had been negligent in advising Linder and drafting the will.  O’Bryan successfully moved for summary judgment on the basis that he owed no duty to the relatives because they were neither his clients nor known third-party beneficiaries.  The relatives now appeal.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT