Clark's Sales & Services, Inc. v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. - 1/22/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  January 22, 2014 
11:00 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 49A02-1306-PL-552. Clark’s Sales & Service, Inc. (“Clark’s”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for preliminary injunction as to a restrictive covenant it sought to enforce against former Clark’s employee, John D. Smith, and his new employer, Ferguson Enterprises Inc.  Smith worked for Clark’s for approximately fourteen years before leaving to work for Ferguson.  During his employment with Clark’s, Smith signed an employment agreement which included a noncompetition provision.  The trial court concluded that the noncompetition provision that Clark’s drafted is overly broad and unenforceable. Clark’s maintains that the noncompetition provision is reasonable and enforceable as written but, in the event we determine that it is not, Clark’s requests this Court to apply the blue pencil doctrine to make the provision reasonable and enforceable. If it is determined that the noncompetition provision in the employment agreement is (or can be made) reasonable and enforceable, Smith and Ferguson assert that Clark’s request for an injunction must still fail because Clark’s previously committed a material breach of the employment contract it now seeks to enforce.  Clark’s responds that a “survival of obligations” provision in the contract precludes Smith from raising the material breach defense.

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

  2. wow is this a bunch of bs! i know the facts!

  3. MCBA .... time for a new release about your entire membership (or is it just the alter ego) being "saddened and disappointed" in the failure to lynch a police officer protecting himself in the line of duty. But this time against Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "WASHINGTON — Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?ref=us&_r=0

  4. Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

  5. It's a capital offense...one for you Latin scholars..

ADVERTISEMENT