Clark's Sales & Services, Inc. v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. - 1/22/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  January 22, 2014 
11:00 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 49A02-1306-PL-552. Clark’s Sales & Service, Inc. (“Clark’s”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for preliminary injunction as to a restrictive covenant it sought to enforce against former Clark’s employee, John D. Smith, and his new employer, Ferguson Enterprises Inc.  Smith worked for Clark’s for approximately fourteen years before leaving to work for Ferguson.  During his employment with Clark’s, Smith signed an employment agreement which included a noncompetition provision.  The trial court concluded that the noncompetition provision that Clark’s drafted is overly broad and unenforceable. Clark’s maintains that the noncompetition provision is reasonable and enforceable as written but, in the event we determine that it is not, Clark’s requests this Court to apply the blue pencil doctrine to make the provision reasonable and enforceable. If it is determined that the noncompetition provision in the employment agreement is (or can be made) reasonable and enforceable, Smith and Ferguson assert that Clark’s request for an injunction must still fail because Clark’s previously committed a material breach of the employment contract it now seeks to enforce.  Clark’s responds that a “survival of obligations” provision in the contract precludes Smith from raising the material breach defense.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

ADVERTISEMENT