Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. v. Bridgewater - 2/3/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  February 3, 2014 
9:00 AM  EST

9 a.m. 93S02-1310-EX-704. Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. ("FACES") provided enrichment opportunities to the homeschooled children of its member families. One family, the Bridgewaters, filed a complaint with the Indiana Civil Rights Commission ("ICRC") alleging FACES discriminated against their daughter by failing to accommodate her medical disability at a FACES sponsored dinner-dance. Thereafter, FACES expelled the Bridgewaters. The ICRC concluded that although FACES did not fail to accommodate the daughter's disability, it did commit unlawful discrimination by expelling the Bridgewaters in retaliation for their filing the complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed, in part. Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Soc'y Inc. v. Bridgewater, 990 N.E.2d 29 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), vacated. The Supreme Court has granted a petition to transfer the case and has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT