Nathan Wertz v. Asset Acceptance, LLC - 2/25/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  February 25, 2014 
11:00 AM  EST

11 a.m. 71A03-1305-CC-175 . Nathan Wertz appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his counterclaim against Asset Acceptance, LLC, pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 12(B)(6) for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.  In his counterclaim, Wertz alleged that Asset, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in Michigan, had attempted to collect a debt from Wertz, which it had purchased from the original lending institution, in Indiana without first having obtained a license from the Department of Financial Institutions pursuant to Indiana’s Uniform Consumer Credit Code.  The parties also dispute whether Asset was required to obtain a license under the Indiana Collection Agency Act, whether Wertz’s counterclaim sufficiently pleaded a claim under the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act, and whether Wertz’s counterclaim entitled him to relief under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Can I get this form on line,if not where can I obtain one. I am eligible.

  2. What a fine example of the best of the Hoosier tradition! How sad that the AP has to include partisan snark in the obit for this great American patriot and adventurer.

  3. Why are all these lawyers yakking to the media about pending matters? Trial by media? What the devil happened to not making extrajudicial statements? The system is falling apart.

  4. It is a sad story indeed as this couple has been only in survival mode, NOT found guilty with Ponzi, shaken down for 5 years and pursued by prosecution that has been ignited by a civil suit with very deep pockets wrenched in their bitterness...It has been said that many of us are breaking an average of 300 federal laws a day without even knowing it. Structuring laws, & civilForfeiture laws are among the scariest that need to be restructured or repealed . These laws were initially created for drug Lords and laundering money and now reach over that line. Here you have a couple that took out their own money, not drug money, not laundering. Yes...Many upset that they lost money...but how much did they make before it all fell apart? No one ask that question? A civil suit against Williams was awarded because he has no more money to fight...they pushed for a break in order...they took all his belongings...even underwear, shoes and clothes? who does that? What allows that? Maybe if you had the picture of him purchasing a jacket at the Goodwill just to go to court the next day...his enemy may be satisfied? But not likely...bitterness is a master. For happy ending lovers, you will be happy to know they have a faith that has changed their world and a solid love that many of us can only dream about. They will spend their time in federal jail for taking their money from their account, but at the end of the day they have loyal friends, a true love and a hope of a new life in time...and none of that can be bought or taken That is the real story.

  5. Could be his email did something especially heinous, really over the top like questioning Ind S.Ct. officials or accusing JLAP of being the political correctness police.

ADVERTISEMENT