Aubrey Thompson v. State of Indiana - 3/25/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  March 25, 2014 
1:00 PM  EST

1 p.m. 49A02-1307-CR-606. Terre Haute South High School. Aubrey Thompson appeals her conviction for Class B misdemeanor public intoxication.  On November 18, 2012, officers with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department were dispatched to the residence of Thompson’s friends Denise Robinson to investigate an altercation between Robinson and her boyfriend.  Thompson was present when the officers arrived on the scene, and the officers observed her to be intoxicated.  As the officers questioned Robinson and her boyfriend about the alleged altercation, Thompson interrupted several times.  Each time, the officers asked Thompson to step away.  Eventually, Thompson retrieved her purse and advised that she intended to drive away.  Fearing that Thompson was putting herself and others on the roadway in danger, the officers arrested Thompson for public intoxication.  Thompson claims there is insufficient evidence that she endangered herself or others.

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Based on several recent Indy Star articles, I would agree that being a case worker would be really hard. You would see the worst of humanity on a daily basis; and when things go wrong guess who gets blamed??!! Not biological parent!! Best of luck to those who entered that line of work.

  2. I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . dfkcfdkdgbekdffe

  3. Don't believe me, listen to Pacino: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bC9w9cH-M

  4. Law school is social control the goal to produce a social product. As such it began after the Revolution and has nearly ruined us to this day: "“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States which is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. Hence all parties are obliged to borrow, in their daily controversies, the ideas, and even the language, peculiar to judicial proceedings. As most public men [i.e., politicians] are, or have been, legal practitioners, they introduce the customs and technicalities of their profession into the management of public affairs. The jury extends this habitude to all classes. The language of the law thus becomes, in some measure, a vulgar tongue; the spirit of the law, which is produced in the schools and courts of justice, gradually penetrates beyond their walls into the bosom of society, where it descends to the lowest classes, so that at last the whole people contract the habits and the tastes of the judicial magistrate.” ? Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

  5. Attorney? Really? Or is it former attorney? Status with the Ind St Ct? Status with federal court, with SCOTUS? This is a legal newspaper, or should I look elsewhere?

ADVERTISEMENT