Jerry Smith v. State of Indiana - 5/1/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  May 1, 2014 
10:30 AM  EST

10:30 a.m. 15A05-1208-CR-411 & 24A01-1210-CR-469. After Smith pleaded guilty to federal charges relating to an investment scheme, he moved to dismiss charges pending against him in the Franklin Circuit Court and in the Dearborn Superior Court, arguing that Indiana Code section 35-41-4-5 bars the subsequent state-court prosecutions.  The trial courts denied his motions to dismiss in part.  In the separate appeals that followed, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts’ rulings in part and reversed in part in separate opinions.  Smith v. State, 993 N.E.2d 1182 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), trans. pending, and Smith v. State, 993 N.E.2d 1184 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), trans. pending.  Smith has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over both of the appeals.  The Court will hear the two cases in a combined oral argument, but otherwise has not consolidated the appeals.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

  2. A common refrain in the comments on this website comes from people who cannot locate attorneys willing put justice over retainers. At the same time the judiciary threatens to make pro bono work mandatory, seemingly noting the same concern. But what happens to attorneys who have the chumptzah to threatened the legal status quo in Indiana? Ask Gary Welch, ask Paul Ogden, ask me. Speak truth to power, suffer horrendously accordingly. No wonder Hoosier attorneys who want to keep in good graces merely chase the dollars ... the powers that be have no concerns as to those who are ever for sale to the highest bidder ... for those even willing to compromise for $$$ never allow either justice or constitutionality to cause them to stand up to injustice or unconstitutionality. And the bad apples in the Hoosier barrel, like this one, just keep rotting.

  3. I am one of Steele's victims and was taken for $6,000. I want my money back due to him doing nothing for me. I filed for divorce after a 16 year marriage and lost everything. My kids, my home, cars, money, pension. Every attorney I have talked to is not willing to help me. What can I do? I was told i can file a civil suit but you have to have all of Steelers info that I don't have. Of someone can please help me or tell me what info I need would be great.

  4. It would appear that news breaking on Drudge from the Hoosier state (link below) ties back to this Hoosier story from the beginning of the recent police disrespect period .... MCBA president Cassandra Bentley McNair issued the statement on behalf of the association Dec. 1. The association said it was “saddened and disappointed” by the decision not to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting Michael Brown. “The MCBA does not believe this was a just outcome to this process, and is disheartened that the system we as lawyers are intended to uphold failed the African-American community in such a way,” the association stated. “This situation is not just about the death of Michael Brown, but the thousands of other African-Americans who are disproportionately targeted and killed by police officers.” http://www.thestarpress.com/story/news/local/2016/07/18/hate-cops-sign-prompts-controversy/87242664/

  5. What form or who do I talk to about a d felony which I hear is classified as a 6 now? Who do I talk to. About to get my degree and I need this to go away it's been over 7 years if that helps.

ADVERTISEMENT