TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. Andrew Kesling, et al. - 5/15/14

Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  May 15, 2014 
9:00 AM  EST

9 a.m.  46A03-1207-MI-324. In litigation between siblings who are shareholders of a closely-held corporation, a special litigation committee (“SLC”) was formed to investigate and evaluate derivative claims the minority shareholders sought to pursue on behalf of the corporation, and the SLC issued a report that recommended pursuing some claims but not others.  The corporation moved to dismiss those claims the SLC recommended be rejected, attaching to its motion a heavily-redacted version of that report.  The minority shareholders then sought to compel production of the entire report, save one section not at issue.  The trial court granted the motion to compel production, and the Court of Appeals affirmed on interlocutory appeal.  In re TP Orthodontics, Inc., 995 N.E.2d 1057 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), trans. pending.  The corporation, TP Orthodontics, has petitioned the Supreme Court to accept jurisdiction over the appeal.

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. That comment on this e-site, which reports on every building, courtroom or even insignificant social movement by beltway sycophants as being named to honor the yet-quite-alive former chief judge, is truly laughable!

  2. Is this a social parallel to the Mosby prosecutions in Baltimore? Progressive ideology ever seeks Pilgrims to burn at the stake. (I should know.)

  3. The Conour embarrassment is an example of why it would be a good idea to NOT name public buildings or to erect monuments to "worthy" people until AFTER they have been dead three years, at least. And we also need to stop naming federal buildings and roads after a worthless politician whose only achievement was getting elected multiple times (like a certain Congressman after whom we renamed the largest post office in the state). Also, why have we renamed BOTH the Center Township government center AND the new bus terminal/bum hangout after Julia Carson?

  4. Other than a complete lack of any verifiable and valid historical citations to back your wild context-free accusations, you also forget to allege "ate Native American children, ate slave children, ate their own children, and often did it all while using salad forks rather than dinner forks." (gasp)

  5. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

ADVERTISEMENT