ILNews

Courting civility

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Lawyers behaving badly give the profession a black eye, but nurturing civility among opposing litigators can repair the damage, trial and defense attorneys agreed in a rare joint seminar.

The Indiana Trial Lawyers Association teamed with the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana for the seminar and panel discussion “Two Parties … One Oath: A Conversation on Civility” May 24 at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law in Indianapolis.

Peter D. Palmer, a New Albany trial lawyer and partner at Palmer Thompson Law who concentrates on medical malpractice, said he has a simple and effective strategy for uncivil opposing counsel.

“I like to kill them with kindness,” Palmer said. Engaging bitterness or participating in gamesmanship is counterproductive and draining. “It’s too much stress in my life.”

Speakers and panelists painted incivility with a broad brush to include more than off-putting demeanor in depositions or court. Tactics such as late discovery, repeated delays and onerous demands for depositions all fit the definition.

John O. Feighner, a trial lawyer with Haller & Colvin in Fort Wayne, recalled a personal injury trial in which an opposing counsel’s firm engaged in such tactics, including missed hearings and a last-minute canceling of mediation. He termed such behavior “a lack of civility shown to the court.”

“I’ll never, ever trust that law firm,” he said.

John Trimble, a defense attorney with Lewis Wagner who moderated the panel discussion, said trial and defense attorneys can agree without being disagreeable, and he noted his opposition in cases with Feighner as an example.

“We’ve had some pretty adversarial cases; we’ve never had a moment of incivility,” Trimble said.

But panelists agreed that the digital age has fostered incivility. Email provides a sometimes unwitting opportunity to dash off a note in the heat of the moment that may impart a less-than-civil tone.

“People, including me, will say things in an email they wouldn’t say if they waited a couple of days,” said DTCI President Lonnie Johnson, a partner with Clendening Johnson & Bohrer in Bloomington who participated in the panel.

Palmer said he has a test he conducts before pressing the “send” button: “Would that be an email you’d want a judge to be reading?”

Two judges participated in the seminar and gave addresses: Indiana Justice Steven David and Larry McKinney, federal judge for the Southern District of Indiana.

David invoked the words of former United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: “Few Americans can even recall that our society once sincerely trusted and respected its lawyers.” “I submit we can get back there,” David said. “We cannot be lawyers like our clients see on television.”

McKinney said judges take note of attorneys who might not practice civility. Those who are more frequently called for pre-trial conferences, for example, are probably on that judge’s list.

“We know who you are,” McKinney warned.

Judges, through their authority, can keep proceedings civil. “When a judge has his hand on that case, everyone knows it,” he said.

David said loaded words an attorney directs toward opposing counsel can backfire. When he hears an attorney describe someone or something as “disingenuous,” for instance, “I basically turn to mute. … I shut off.”

il-civility-seminar06-2col.jpg Indiana Trial Lawyers Association representative Peter Palmer, left, and immediate past president John O. Feighner participate in a panel discussion on civility May 24 at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. The ITLA and the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana co-sponsored the first-of-its-kind seminar that featured addresses from Indiana Justice Steven David and Judge Larry McKinney of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Raising the rhetoric can raise the stakes, and incivility costs clients, several panelists said. One noted a case in which legal fees mounted to more than $1 million over a dispute valued at about $300,000.

Raised emotions and pitched litigation contribute to disputes that fail mediation. “Nobody ever wants to resolve a case that’s so involved with these emotional battles,” Trimble said.

Trimble is irritated by attorneys who argue to opposing counsel rather than arguing to the judge. He encountered an attorney who did that recently but suggested that ignoring such theatrics was the better course.

“I think it went a long way with the judge that I didn’t take the bait,” Trimble said.


 

Several panelists said there can be a fine line between legitimate legal tactics and acts that might be considered uncivil.

Defense attorney Donna Fisher, a principal with Smith Fisher Maas & Howard in Indianapolis, confessed that she had crossed that line in her career. She said she worried that she might have fit the characteristics of a take-no-prisoners “Rambo lawyer.”

“How do you balance the need to win with the need to be civil if ‘Rambo’ tactics give you an advantage?” she said. “I am concerned about the profession. I’m concerned that I’m not as civil as I could be . . . There are three rules of civility: Be kind, be kind, be kind.”

Several audience members suggested similar panels on civility in the legal profession be conducted around the state. Others wondered whether law schools might incorporate more instruction on civility.

McKinney said recommendations have been made for law schools to promote such studies.

“There is some pushback from the law schools because, ‘it’s just not academic enough,’” he said.

Feighner, immediate past president of the ITLA, played a key role in organizing the event.

“I was contacted by Lonnie Johnson, president of DTCI, and he in turn had been contacted by Justice David, who wanted to get a joint program supported by ITLA and DTCI to sponsor a civility seminar,” Feighner said.

The ITLA executive board unanimously endorsed the idea, and plans for the seminar were developed. He said it’s a first in recent times that the two associations jointly sponsored an event.

“What made this unique is it was kind of a statewide program and at the law school, which gave it special emphasis,” Feighner said.

“I fully expect that we’ll be talking with Justice David and our counterparts at DTCI to expand the presentation,” he said. “One of the ideas is to focus on law students and young lawyers in both ITLA and DTCI, as kind of a mentoring concept.”

For his part, David said he hopes to see a continuation of the dialogue between the two groups.

“I believe civility has to become the rule all the time and behavior that is not civil must be identified and changed, voluntarily or involuntarily. The client is better served. The profession is better served. The public is better served,” he said.

David said in his opening address that as a judge in Boone County, he insisted that the definition of civility be posted outside the courtroom door. His simple advice: always take the high road.

Attorneys who fail to do so, Trimble said, risk harm to their reputations and further damage to the profession.

“What we do to ourselves with incivility only helps the comedians,” he said.•
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  2. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  3. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  4. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  5. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT