ILNews

Courts celebrate Black History Month

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The chair of the Department of Africana Studies and associate professor of history at Notre Dame University will speak to children and the general public in a lecture titled "Forging the Children of the Sun: The Human Spirit and Jim Crow," a Black History Month program Feb. 20 at the Federal Courthouse in Indianapolis.

In the morning, Dr. Richard Pierce will talk about Jim Crow laws with students in Indianapolis. At 2 p.m., Pierce, who specializes in African-American, urban, and civil rights history, will speak to the general public about Jim Crow laws. The Kenyatta Dance Troup, which specializes in modern dance, will also perform. One hour of CLE credit is pending for the afternoon event.

"We hope (participants) will get an appreciation for black history, but specifically this year for the progress we've made from the Jim Crow era to the present. It's hard to believe that we went from laws that said, 'You can't sit here,' 'You can't drink from this fountain,' 'You can't eat here,' to the present," said Juval Scott, an assistant federal defender and a member of the Black History Month Program Committee.

She added that the event will provide a good opportunity for attorneys to meet and speak with federal judges.

The program will be in Courtroom 307 and a reception and light refreshments will follow.

The program is sponsored by the U.S. District Court, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, U.S. Probation Office, the Office of the U.S. Attorney, the U.S. Marshals Service for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Historical Society of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

No reservation is required for this free event and free CLE credit. For more information, contact Carrie Denny at (317) 229-3716.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT