ILNews

Courts celebrate Black History Month

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The chair of the Department of Africana Studies and associate professor of history at Notre Dame University will speak to children and the general public in a lecture titled "Forging the Children of the Sun: The Human Spirit and Jim Crow," a Black History Month program Feb. 20 at the Federal Courthouse in Indianapolis.

In the morning, Dr. Richard Pierce will talk about Jim Crow laws with students in Indianapolis. At 2 p.m., Pierce, who specializes in African-American, urban, and civil rights history, will speak to the general public about Jim Crow laws. The Kenyatta Dance Troup, which specializes in modern dance, will also perform. One hour of CLE credit is pending for the afternoon event.

"We hope (participants) will get an appreciation for black history, but specifically this year for the progress we've made from the Jim Crow era to the present. It's hard to believe that we went from laws that said, 'You can't sit here,' 'You can't drink from this fountain,' 'You can't eat here,' to the present," said Juval Scott, an assistant federal defender and a member of the Black History Month Program Committee.

She added that the event will provide a good opportunity for attorneys to meet and speak with federal judges.

The program will be in Courtroom 307 and a reception and light refreshments will follow.

The program is sponsored by the U.S. District Court, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, U.S. Probation Office, the Office of the U.S. Attorney, the U.S. Marshals Service for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Historical Society of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

No reservation is required for this free event and free CLE credit. For more information, contact Carrie Denny at (317) 229-3716.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT