ILNews

Cox: Time records and billings are important risk management tools

Dina M. Cox
April 9, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

protecting practice dina coxIt’s sad but true: The work product of an attorney that clients study most closely is the attorney’s bill. Because of this close scrutiny, coupled with your own standards of professionalism, it is important that your time records and any invoice for services sent to the client be clear, detailed and accurate. Maintaining high standards when it comes to time keeping and billing means that you are more likely to be paid, and paid on time; better able to communicate your value to clients; and, effectively documenting your efforts, energy, and file. Good time keeping and billing fosters healthy attorney-client relationships, and these relationships are less likely to end in a claim or lawsuit. If a claim or lawsuit is filed, detailed and accurate time records can assist in disproving the allegations of malpractice.

Time records and bills should be proofread and edited before being finalized or presented to the client. Misspelled names, lack of consistency, tasks billed to the wrong file, or tasks billed at the wrong timekeeper level or rate can irritate even the most patient and loyal client. Moreover, if the theme of a former client’s claim against you is that you were too busy to give the matter sufficient attention, then error-filled, sloppy time records will only underscore this theme.

When editing and proofreading time records and bills, consider whether work that an attorney did should be adjusted to the paralegal rate for tasks that could have been handled by a paralegal. Consider whether certain tasks should be shown on the bill, but entered at “no charge.” Make sure that the descriptions of the services performed can be understood by the client reviewing the bill. Will the description of the task itself justify the time spent? Each entry should identify what was done and why. When the client is finished reading the bill, she should have a clear understanding of what you and your staff did for the last billing period and why, and she should also be left with the impression that the matter was given sufficient attention and that the time spent on the matter by each timekeeper was reasonable.

An itemized invoice for services rendered gives visibility to work product of the attorney that is otherwise invisible to the client. A great example is legal research and analysis that is not reduced to a memo or report sent to the client. Because clients often don’t see their attorney’s work product on a day-to-day basis, and sometimes rarely see tangible work product at all, an itemized invoice can illustrate to the client the amount of time and energy that the attorney is investing and on what subjects. A monthly invoice can also serve to update the client on the status of her matter when no substantive update or report has been sent within the last 30 days.

Detailed billings or time records can also help in the defense of a claim or lawsuit that is brought against the lawyer or law firm. Often, the very first item a professional’s defense attorney will review is the professional’s time records. If complete, these time records provide a tidy timeline of the representation, they document the dates and subject matter of communications on the matter, and they may illustrate the diligent attention that the attorney and his staff paid to the matter.

Time records can also be a good way to document that you performed certain work that is part of due diligence. For example, telephone calls to the client explaining a certain issue in the case (“Discussion with client explaining ramifications of not naming ABC Corp. as a defendant in the complaint”). Then, when the client claims “you never told me what might happen if we didn’t name ABC as a defendant,” you have not only your memory to challenge that assertion, but you have a time record as well, which the client presumably reviewed when he paid the bill. But be forewarned: If you are a meticulous time keeper, the absence of a time record on a particular task can be significant as well. As the saying goes with medical records, if it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen.

It is also worth mentioning that lawsuits for unpaid fees should be carefully considered. A lawsuit for unpaid fees should not be filed unless it is absolutely necessary or warranted. Aggressive collection efforts and suits for fees are often met with malpractice claims against attorneys or disciplinary grievances.

Accurate and clear billings by lawyers can serve as a powerful risk management tool. Satisfied, well-informed clients rarely sue or bring claims, even in the face of a legal error. A lawyer is more empowered to resolve disputes or errors with a satisfied, well-informed client. A detailed, timely, and accurate itemized invoice for services rendered can keep your clients satisfied and well-informed. Detailed time records can also help defend against complaints lodged against you.•

__________

Dina M. Cox is an attorney with Lewis Wagner LLP in Indianapolis. She focuses her practice on professional liability defense, drug and medical device/products liability defense, consumer class-action defense, insurance coverage, and insurance bad-faith defense litigation. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT