ILNews

Critics decry Pence team for letting state fair stage collapse rule expire

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Pence administration has let expire the emergency rule put in place after the 2011 Indiana State Fair stage collapse that left seven people dead and dozens injured.

And the regulators in charge of the rule are months or even years away from replacing it.

The emergency rule, which established stricter design and construction requirements for outdoor event equipment such as stage rigging, expired nearly a year ago, on Jan. 1.

Indiana Department of Homeland Security spokesman John Erickson said permanent rule-making to replace the emergency regulations has already started. But he acknowledged the process can take up to two years.

“The rule is still being used as a guideline to assist with outdoor equipment safety,” Erickson told IBJ. “The agency is encouraged by the level of voluntary compliance with these guidelines.”

But Indianapolis developer Craig Von Deylen, a member of the State Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission, said he was disappointed the state “let the rule lapse” and said the commission could have noticed the impending expiration of the rule and acted had it been provided adequate staff to do its job.

“People died in an incident in the state prior to that rule,” Von Deylen said. “It cost the state a considerable amount of money in both legal fees and settlements.”

The emergency rule was originally set to expire in 2014. However, a bill passed by the General Assembly extended that deadline to Jan. 1, 2016, which gave state regulators more time to establish permanent rules. But commission members said the rule-making process only started this fall.

Von Deylen said the building safety commission is behind on its work because key legal and administrative staff positions once in place at the state level to review and update the codes have been eliminated.

He called for the governor to “provide [the commission] with adequate staff so we can do our job” and wondered if the governor could “sign an emergency order to make the rule come back into effect.”

Asked about the criticism, Erickson told IBJ that “the Indiana Department of Homeland Security staff provides resources based on the Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission priorities.”

“If there are projects for which the commission needs additional staff resources beyond what is currently in place, the agency will provide the expertise and staffing necessary,” he said.

The flap comes amid consternation about the possible lapse of other state codes that the commission promulgates.

IBJ reported last week that critics were also unhappy with the Pence team’s decision not to renew the state’s energy code for commercial structures by the end of the year, which could leave the state without one for up to two years. The residential code is set to expire in 2018.

But the expiration of the outdoor event equipment rule that came after the state fair tragedy is striking a raw nerve.

In the wake of the tragedy, Washington, D.C.-based public safety and crisis management firm Witt Associates determined in an independent analysis that “the state of Indiana should adopt and implement stringent regulation of the type of structure that collapsed during the state fair.”

It also determined that “national model building and fire codes should be strengthened to reflect the increased complexity of such structures.”

The emergency rule instituted design and construction for equipment above a certain height—such as temporary or permanent towers, booms, ramps, platforms, overhead assemblies, and ancillary rigging—and required it to be inspected by the state. It also required the public to be kept far enough away from the equipment to be safe from a collapse.

Jason Shelley, executive director of the local chapter of the American Institute of Architects, complained that the rules are “merely suggestions now.”

“Nothing would stop the stage fair collapse from happening again,” Shelley said.

The state and 19 companies were part of a $50 million settlement reached in 2015 with victims of the stage collapse. The state paid $11 million of that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT