Day of Service taps into attorneys’ non-legal skills

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

From her summer as an associate at a large Chicago law firm, Candace Armstrong remembers the social activities, the fancy lunches and outings to Cubs games.

Mostly she recalls trying to balance a drink, a tiny hors d’oeuvre and talking about nothing. However, the social activity that still resonates with her is the Saturday she joined law partners and corporate executives to paint an inner-city school gymnasium.

Helping the community alongside attorneys dressed in shorts and baseball caps made the Saturday task her favorite social activity, the Newton County solo practitioner said.

Armstrong and her colleagues from the Indiana State Bar Association’s inaugural Leadership Development Academy class are hoping to create that sense of volunteerism and camaraderie through the ISBA Day of Service. On one day each year, the class envisions lawyers from around the state doing nonlegal charitable work in their own communities.

This year, that day will be Sept. 21.

Activities could include preparing a meal in a soup kitchen, building a house for Habitat for Humanity, shelving books at the local library, clearing weeds in a city park, and working at a local nursing home to paint a couple of outdoor benches as well as help with an afternoon bingo game.

“We want lawyers and judges to get out there and kind of get their hands dirty,” said LDA graduate Jaime Oss.

The idea originated from a free-thinking exercise where the class members wrote down what they loved about Indiana and what they could do to make the Hoosier state better. Those lists evolved into the service committee, now a permanent standing committee of the ISBA.

Oss, partner at Huelat Mack & Kreppein P.C., is the chair of the service committee and David Lynch, attorney with Amy Noe Law in Richmond, is the vice-chair.

“I think it’s really important that people see that lawyers are not afraid to get dirty and are not afraid to be real people,” Lynch said.

Early exuberance has met reality as the class has reached out to local bar associations and tried to enlist attorneys. Getting the buy-in has been more difficult than expected, but committee members attribute the hesitancy to this being the first year for the Day of Service. They are optimistic the program will grow in the coming years to involve thousands of bar members volunteering across the state on a single day.

“I think it’s a great idea,” said Alan Miller, president of the Dearborn and Ohio counties bar associations. “I’m sort of surprised this wasn’t done before.”

Getting out of the courtroom and working together on a project with opposing counsel will help build civility within the bar, Miller, partner at Zerbe Garner Miller & Blondell LLP, said. Having a group of attorneys giving up part of Saturday may motivate people outside the legal community to give back as well.

To be successful, Lynch believes the bar associations should pair with other local service organizations to work on a project. These groups will have a volunteer base and projects in progress that attorneys could help with rather than trying to start from scratch.

Pairing will also enable attorneys to develop connections with people who serve the local needs.

“I personally get a lot of benefit from dealing with people who are dedicated servant leaders,” Lynch said. “I just personally find myself more comfortable with folks who are dedicated volunteers to whatever local service agency they’re passionate about.”

When Tim Baker, magistrate judge for the Southern District of Indiana, first learned of the Day of Service, he quickly asked for more information. Like Armstrong, he was partly inspired by the fun of volunteering with other attorneys several years ago to paint a woman’s house.

Lawyers do many good things already, Baker said, but the Day of Service will allow a larger portion of the public all across the state to see these good works.

Moreover, the event will allow the bench to get involved. Baker said while they are always calling upon lawyers to do pro bono, the judges are limited in the kinds of charitable help they can do. The Day of Service will give judges the opportunity to volunteer like they have asked many attorneys to do.

From the house painting effort, Baker remembered the homeowner being surprised that a bunch of attorneys had come to do the work and that she was smiling broadly when the job was done.

“I remember I had a sore back,” Baker said of his experience, “but it was a good kind of sore.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.