ILNews

Day of Service taps into attorneys’ non-legal skills

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

From her summer as an associate at a large Chicago law firm, Candace Armstrong remembers the social activities, the fancy lunches and outings to Cubs games.

Mostly she recalls trying to balance a drink, a tiny hors d’oeuvre and talking about nothing. However, the social activity that still resonates with her is the Saturday she joined law partners and corporate executives to paint an inner-city school gymnasium.

Helping the community alongside attorneys dressed in shorts and baseball caps made the Saturday task her favorite social activity, the Newton County solo practitioner said.

Armstrong and her colleagues from the Indiana State Bar Association’s inaugural Leadership Development Academy class are hoping to create that sense of volunteerism and camaraderie through the ISBA Day of Service. On one day each year, the class envisions lawyers from around the state doing nonlegal charitable work in their own communities.

This year, that day will be Sept. 21.

Activities could include preparing a meal in a soup kitchen, building a house for Habitat for Humanity, shelving books at the local library, clearing weeds in a city park, and working at a local nursing home to paint a couple of outdoor benches as well as help with an afternoon bingo game.

“We want lawyers and judges to get out there and kind of get their hands dirty,” said LDA graduate Jaime Oss.

The idea originated from a free-thinking exercise where the class members wrote down what they loved about Indiana and what they could do to make the Hoosier state better. Those lists evolved into the service committee, now a permanent standing committee of the ISBA.

Oss, partner at Huelat Mack & Kreppein P.C., is the chair of the service committee and David Lynch, attorney with Amy Noe Law in Richmond, is the vice-chair.

“I think it’s really important that people see that lawyers are not afraid to get dirty and are not afraid to be real people,” Lynch said.

Early exuberance has met reality as the class has reached out to local bar associations and tried to enlist attorneys. Getting the buy-in has been more difficult than expected, but committee members attribute the hesitancy to this being the first year for the Day of Service. They are optimistic the program will grow in the coming years to involve thousands of bar members volunteering across the state on a single day.

“I think it’s a great idea,” said Alan Miller, president of the Dearborn and Ohio counties bar associations. “I’m sort of surprised this wasn’t done before.”

Getting out of the courtroom and working together on a project with opposing counsel will help build civility within the bar, Miller, partner at Zerbe Garner Miller & Blondell LLP, said. Having a group of attorneys giving up part of Saturday may motivate people outside the legal community to give back as well.

To be successful, Lynch believes the bar associations should pair with other local service organizations to work on a project. These groups will have a volunteer base and projects in progress that attorneys could help with rather than trying to start from scratch.

Pairing will also enable attorneys to develop connections with people who serve the local needs.

“I personally get a lot of benefit from dealing with people who are dedicated servant leaders,” Lynch said. “I just personally find myself more comfortable with folks who are dedicated volunteers to whatever local service agency they’re passionate about.”

When Tim Baker, magistrate judge for the Southern District of Indiana, first learned of the Day of Service, he quickly asked for more information. Like Armstrong, he was partly inspired by the fun of volunteering with other attorneys several years ago to paint a woman’s house.

Lawyers do many good things already, Baker said, but the Day of Service will allow a larger portion of the public all across the state to see these good works.

Moreover, the event will allow the bench to get involved. Baker said while they are always calling upon lawyers to do pro bono, the judges are limited in the kinds of charitable help they can do. The Day of Service will give judges the opportunity to volunteer like they have asked many attorneys to do.

From the house painting effort, Baker remembered the homeowner being surprised that a bunch of attorneys had come to do the work and that she was smiling broadly when the job was done.

“I remember I had a sore back,” Baker said of his experience, “but it was a good kind of sore.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT