The Indiana Department of Child Services wants the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to review a judge's decision to temporarily
stop DCS rate cuts.
The state filed its notice of appeal Thursday in C.H., et al. v. James W. Payne, 1:09-CV-1574, in U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. The state is appealing District Judge Sarah Evans Barker's
Jan. 20 decision to grant a preliminary injunction preventing DCS from cutting reimbursement rates for adoptive and foster
parents and child care agencies.
Both the parents and the Indiana Association of Residential Child Care Agencies sued DCS in December after learning of cuts
to reimbursement rates paid by DCS to those parties. The suits were consolidated into one, C.H. v. Payne. The combined
suit represents more than 100 agencies statewide and has been certified as a class action for foster and adoptive parents
throughout Indiana.
Judge Barker said in her 38-page order that much more than money is at issue in the case.
"It is the quality of care promised to the children under the applicable statutes that is at stake in the case at bar,"
she wrote. "Any deficiency in such care cannot later be undone with monetary compensation."
DCS spokesperson Ann Houseworth told Indiana Lawyer in an e-mail that the decision to appeal was made after reviewing
their options and concluding that the injunction places an undue restraint on the agency's ability to further improve
Indiana's system of child services.
"We believe that appealing this decision will serve the best interests of all the children we serve," she said.
The state hasn't filed its brief yet, but has 40 days from Thursday to do so.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...