ILNews

Dean's Desk: Indianapolis law school enters new era

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

deans-desk-robertsI am sure that almost everyone reading this will have heard about the transformative gift to the Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis that, along with matching money, will increase the school’s effective endowment by $31.5 million. As a result, the school has been renamed the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law for the benefactor of this magnificent philanthropic investment.

As I said at the Dec. 1, 2011, event announcing our new name, one’s good name is a person’s most valuable possession, and Bob McKinney’s name is one of the best. Bob has spent a lifetime in selfless and generous service to his country and his community as a naval officer, chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, a name partner and practicing lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans and as the chairman and CEO of First Indiana Bank. He is loved, admired and respected by all who know him and by legions of people whose lives he has enriched. Having his name on our law school is like gold in the bank. Everyone connected to the school should forever be especially proud to be associated with an institution bearing the name of Robert H. McKinney.

Bob’s great gift will do so much for the school that it is hard to explain it in a brief column. The money, of course, will go into the endowment as it is received and, first, will establish five endowed chairs in the areas of intellectual property, tax, environmental law, technology and law, and health law. This will enable the school to recruit five renowned senior-level faculty whose presence will greatly enhance both the quality of teaching and research as well as our national reputation. After these chairs are established, the remaining $17.5 million will go into an account that will generate scholarship dollars enabling the school to recruit increasing numbers of very top law school applicants and to hold down the spiraling cost of legal education (and thus the debt burden) for many of our graduates. Thus, the gift goes a long way to helping us achieve the first two goals of our 2009 Strategic Plan – enhancing and supporting the faculty and providing financial support for our students.

But the gift does far more than simply provide a financial boost. First, as noted above, it gives the school a name that is widely respected throughout Indiana. And in the process, it rebrands the school in a way that enhances its image across the nation and the world. Throughout higher education, universities, campuses and schools that have a hyphen followed by a city in their names are often assumed by the unfamiliar as being branch or regional in nature, but not first rate. While that is not always accurate or fair, it is a reality that saddles many fine institutions with a tarnished image. By dropping “– Indianapolis” from our name, and by becoming one of only 15 law schools in the United States named after a major benefactor who believed the school worthy of bearing his name and of such an enormous investment, the school has been rebranded with a golden identity that will increase its reputation and rankings significantly.

Furthermore, this gift will provide critical impetus for greatly increasing support from others upon whom the school depends. Bob McKinney’s gift, while wonderful, will not by itself take the school to where it can and should be, namely among the nation’s most elite public law schools. Bob recognized this himself and has challenged the alumni and others to step up.

The fact is that our school has historically received relatively little philanthropic support. A small percentage of our alumni has given back to the school. And what at most law schools would be thought of as nice but modest has here been regarded as a major gift. No more! Bob McKinney has set a new tone and new standard. Just in the weeks since his gift was announced, we have received several large gifts, are having serious conversations with many others about possible six- and seven-figure gifts and the number of annual fund gifts has started a meaningful uptick. So Bob’s gift will enable the school to leverage the excitement and pride it has generated and to increase the level of overall support, both financial and otherwise, to new heights and the school to new levels of excellence.

This is all truly fantastic news for the law school that provides the state of Indiana with half of its lawyers, about 40 percent of its judges and a large percentage of its business, non-profit, government and political leadership. There is little doubt that the quality of the graduates of our law school, and the quality of the education they receive here, will directly correlate with the quality of leadership and, in turn, the quality of life for all Hoosiers. Bob McKinney has created a momentum that will truly make Indiana a better place for everyone.•
__________

Gary R. Roberts
has been dean of the Robert H. McKinney School of Law since 2007. The opinions expressed are the author’s.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.

  2. SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.

    Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
    Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
    Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
    It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.

  3. Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
    As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
    This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.

  4. Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.

  5. This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

ADVERTISEMENT