ILNews

Dean's Desk: Indianapolis law school enters new era

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

deans-desk-robertsI am sure that almost everyone reading this will have heard about the transformative gift to the Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis that, along with matching money, will increase the school’s effective endowment by $31.5 million. As a result, the school has been renamed the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law for the benefactor of this magnificent philanthropic investment.

As I said at the Dec. 1, 2011, event announcing our new name, one’s good name is a person’s most valuable possession, and Bob McKinney’s name is one of the best. Bob has spent a lifetime in selfless and generous service to his country and his community as a naval officer, chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, a name partner and practicing lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans and as the chairman and CEO of First Indiana Bank. He is loved, admired and respected by all who know him and by legions of people whose lives he has enriched. Having his name on our law school is like gold in the bank. Everyone connected to the school should forever be especially proud to be associated with an institution bearing the name of Robert H. McKinney.

Bob’s great gift will do so much for the school that it is hard to explain it in a brief column. The money, of course, will go into the endowment as it is received and, first, will establish five endowed chairs in the areas of intellectual property, tax, environmental law, technology and law, and health law. This will enable the school to recruit five renowned senior-level faculty whose presence will greatly enhance both the quality of teaching and research as well as our national reputation. After these chairs are established, the remaining $17.5 million will go into an account that will generate scholarship dollars enabling the school to recruit increasing numbers of very top law school applicants and to hold down the spiraling cost of legal education (and thus the debt burden) for many of our graduates. Thus, the gift goes a long way to helping us achieve the first two goals of our 2009 Strategic Plan – enhancing and supporting the faculty and providing financial support for our students.

But the gift does far more than simply provide a financial boost. First, as noted above, it gives the school a name that is widely respected throughout Indiana. And in the process, it rebrands the school in a way that enhances its image across the nation and the world. Throughout higher education, universities, campuses and schools that have a hyphen followed by a city in their names are often assumed by the unfamiliar as being branch or regional in nature, but not first rate. While that is not always accurate or fair, it is a reality that saddles many fine institutions with a tarnished image. By dropping “– Indianapolis” from our name, and by becoming one of only 15 law schools in the United States named after a major benefactor who believed the school worthy of bearing his name and of such an enormous investment, the school has been rebranded with a golden identity that will increase its reputation and rankings significantly.

Furthermore, this gift will provide critical impetus for greatly increasing support from others upon whom the school depends. Bob McKinney’s gift, while wonderful, will not by itself take the school to where it can and should be, namely among the nation’s most elite public law schools. Bob recognized this himself and has challenged the alumni and others to step up.

The fact is that our school has historically received relatively little philanthropic support. A small percentage of our alumni has given back to the school. And what at most law schools would be thought of as nice but modest has here been regarded as a major gift. No more! Bob McKinney has set a new tone and new standard. Just in the weeks since his gift was announced, we have received several large gifts, are having serious conversations with many others about possible six- and seven-figure gifts and the number of annual fund gifts has started a meaningful uptick. So Bob’s gift will enable the school to leverage the excitement and pride it has generated and to increase the level of overall support, both financial and otherwise, to new heights and the school to new levels of excellence.

This is all truly fantastic news for the law school that provides the state of Indiana with half of its lawyers, about 40 percent of its judges and a large percentage of its business, non-profit, government and political leadership. There is little doubt that the quality of the graduates of our law school, and the quality of the education they receive here, will directly correlate with the quality of leadership and, in turn, the quality of life for all Hoosiers. Bob McKinney has created a momentum that will truly make Indiana a better place for everyone.•
__________

Gary R. Roberts
has been dean of the Robert H. McKinney School of Law since 2007. The opinions expressed are the author’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT