ILNews

Dean's Desk: IU McKinney dean reflects on first year on the job

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dean Andrew KleinIt’s been nearly a year since I became dean of the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, and it would be impossible to fully describe the experience in this short column. But as the philosopher and educator John Dewey once said, “We do not learn from experience ... we learn from reflecting on experience.” So indulge me some brief reflections.

 

Reflection No. 1: I am humbled by the amazing impact that my school’s alumni and students have in this community and beyond.

Here are just a few examples:

• The McKinney Law graduating class of 2014 collectively donated more than 22,000 hours of pro bono service to the community during their time as students. Many volunteered while juggling not only school, but work and family responsibilities as well. I was proud that a McKinney Law student, Tara Baldwin, received the Indianapolis Bar Association’s Pro Bono Award at the organization’s annual recognition luncheon last fall. I was equally proud when the IBA named another McKinney Law student, Matt Maples, “Law Student of the Year” this spring in honor of his commitment to pro bono service.

• Our school’s namesake, Robert H. McKinney, along with Indiana University President Michael McRobbie, was honored by the Anti-Defamation League with a “Man of Achievement” award for work fostering community, justice and equal opportunity. Bob McKinney is an outstanding role model, and it is inspiring to see his philanthropy making a difference as we prepare the next generation of leaders and lawyers.

• Speaking of leaders and lawyers, how about Jeff Papa (J.D. ’99 and LL.M. ’10)? Jeff is chief of staff and legal counsel for the Indiana Senate, president of the Zionsville Town Council, working toward a doctorate in education leadership, and the father to two elementary-school-aged daughters. He also remains busy with a nonprofit organization he founded, Youth Enhancement and Training Initiative, that supports an orphanage in Nepal in Southeast Asia. Wow!

Reflection No. 2: I am impressed with how my school helps enrich the community with thought-provoking, vibrant and relevant programming. Again, a few examples:

• Our Black Law Students Association and Hispanic Law Society co-hosted an event celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act. Jennett Hill (’98), senior vice president and general counsel of Citizens Energy, gave a keynote address and spoke eloquently about what the Act and the Civil Rights Movement has meant for her career.

• Our student-run Equal Justice Works organization hosted its sixth annual Public Interest Recognition Dinner and honored three amazing alumni: Kennard Bennett (’82), who focuses his practice on guardianships and consumer health issues; Monica Foster (’83), who is nationally known for her defense of indigent clients who face the death penalty; and Judge Brett J. Niemeier (’85), who gives so much of his time on behalf of children in Vanderburgh County. The event raised funds for our Loan Repayment Assistance Program, which helps students who choose public interest careers to repay their student loan debt.

• On March 11, our building’s atrium was packed with hundreds of people for the school’s inaugural job fair. The fair was the brainchild of our Student Bar Association leadership, who worked with our law school staff and alumni association to organize the event. I was proud that, instead of simply wringing hands over a tough job market, our students chose to engage and do something about it.

Reflection No. 3: My final reflection is that law school deans have the opportunity to do some really cool things!

• During the course of the school year, I crisscrossed the state of Indiana, meeting hundreds of alumni and friends from Merrillville to Evansville and all points in between. I met young lawyers who are building professions and improving communities. I met CEOs and general counsels who lead major companies. I met leaders in the Statehouse and in Congress, all of whom represent our school and profession incredibly well.

• I visited with alumni across the country, traveling to places like Chicago; Washington, D.C.; Phoenix and south Florida. I knew that McKinney Law alumni were widely placed, but I now see the impact that they make throughout the nation.

• I traveled to China with my colleague Professor Tom Wilson, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David (’82), and William Singer (’12), helping to foster relationships in a country where our school has maintained strong friendships and programs for more than 25 years.

• And to top it all off, I got to throw out a first pitch at an Indianapolis Indians game with a big crowd from the McKinney Law family cheering me on. And, yes, I got the ball over the plate.

Best wishes for a wonderful summer, and thanks to so many of you for your friendship and incredible support of the Indiana University McKinney School of Law.•

__________

Andrew R. Klein is the dean and the Paul E. Beam Professor of Law at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I like the concept. Seems like a good idea and really inexpensive to manage.

  2. I don't agree that this is an extreme case. There are more of these people than you realize - people that are vindictive and/or with psychological issues have clogged the system with baseless suits that are costly to the defendant and to taxpayers. Restricting repeat offenders from further abusing the system is not akin to restricting their freedon, but to protecting their victims, and the court system, from allowing them unfettered access. From the Supreme Court opinion "he has burdened the opposing party and the courts of this state at every level with massive, confusing, disorganized, defective, repetitive, and often meritless filings."

  3. So, if you cry wolf one too many times courts may "restrict" your ability to pursue legal action? Also, why is document production equated with wealth? Anyone can "produce probably tens of thousands of pages of filings" if they have a public library card. I understand this is an extreme case, but our Supreme Court really got this one wrong.

  4. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  5. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

ADVERTISEMENT