ILNews

Dean's Desk: Notre Dame Law in Chicago shows promise

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

newton DeanChicago is the No. 1 destination for Notre Dame Law School graduates, followed closely by Washington, D.C., New York City and Los Angeles, with Indianapolis rounding out the top five. But while many NDLS students plan to practice law in a major metropolitan area, until recently there were limited opportunities for them to explore and experience what it is actually like to practice law in a big city.

The Notre Dame Law in Chicago program helps address that need by allowing NDLS students to spend a full semester living and working in the Windy City. All participants work four days a week in an externship placement. Since the program was launched last fall, our students (some of whom have an Illinois student practice license, commonly known as a 711 license) have prosecuted felony and juvenile criminal cases, represented indigent clients in immigration and family law matters, clerked in judicial chambers, mediated civil cases, and developed environmental regulations, all while completing their related course work. While many of the externships are in agencies and nonprofits, Bob Jones, the associate dean for Experiential Programs, is working to place students in corporate counsel offices and financial regulatory agencies as well.

While our Chicago students earn academic credits for their field placements, they also participate in a weekly seminar taught in Chicago by Dean Jones. The seminar is designed to help students maximize the learning from their externships by helping them reflect on ethics questions and their own professional development. Students also must earn additional academic credits through course work that is not associated with the externship.

After a successful first year, we have decided to take the program to the next level by building it a new home in the heart of the Loop. We are in the process of remodeling and furnishing office and classroom space on the second floor of the Motorola Building (the former Santa Fe building). When the doors to this fully renovated space open in the fall of 2013, faculty and students will find office space, a conference room and a 40-person classroom equipped with the latest distance-learning technology.

We recently completed a successful experiment in distance learning when our students in South Bend participated in an international law class that was being taught in our London Law Center. Enabling our South Bend students to share the same classroom experience that is being enjoyed by our Chicago program students will open up more opportunities for students in both locations.

Connecting our Chicago and South Bend classrooms will enable us to recruit adjunct professors to teach courses in niche areas that are important to developing areas of practice. Most of our relatively small number of adjunct professors hail from nearby South Bend. A few Chicagoland attorneys have even been willing to commute to South Bend in order to teach our students on campus. Our Chicago presence, however, will enable us to expand our specialty course offerings. When we no longer have to insist that every adjunct professor make the round trip to South Bend in order to teach a class for Notre Dame, we will be better able to tap into the deep pool of experienced Chicago attorneys in a wide variety of practice areas.

We will share the Motorola Building space with Notre Dame’s College of Engineering and College of Science. For example, the Master of Science in Patent Law (MSPL) program (a venture of the Law, Science and Engineering colleges), and ESTEEM (the Engineering, Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Excellence Masters Program) are also planning to introduce programs in Chicago. All of our on-campus partners, including the College of Arts and Letters, will be able to join us in using the site for panels and small conferences, giving us an opportunity to introduce more Notre Dame programs and faculty to our many Chicago alumni.

I have great expectations for our school’s new move into the Windy City. When NDLS students can fully experience the beautiful Notre Dame campus while taking additional courses as they are being taught in our Chicago classroom, they will have the best of both worlds. And when NDLS students can learn what it is like to practice law in a major metropolitan area before making the commitment to move there permanently, they will be better able to make an informed decision about the direction they would like their careers to take. The Law in Chicago program shows a great deal of promise. I will keep you posted on how it develops.•

__________

Nell Jessup Newton is The Joseph A. Matson Dean and Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School. She has served as dean since 2009. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT