ILNews

Death penalty foe Foster pumps up federal defenders

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

“I have the best job in Indianapolis. I love this job.”

Monica Foster is talking about the position she’s held since Sept. 1 – executive director of Indiana Federal Community Defenders Inc. Renown for her successful defense of capital cases and her outspoken animus toward the death penalty, she says her new role leading a team of defenders in the federal courts is a natural progression.

Foster is in charge of an office of about 15, including six attorneys, responsible for court-appointed defense work for people charged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, based in Indianapolis.

il-Monica_Foster02-15col.jpg Monica Foster has taken over as executive director of Indiana Federal Community Defenders Inc. in the Southern District. She replaced Bill Marsh, who retired after 17 years as the sole leader of the agency he founded.(IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

“In some ways this is a continuation of a lifelong pursuit of indigent defense,” she says. “Turns out I liked doing the administrative stuff, too.”

That includes cajoling the federal court system to open its pocketbook – another skill she finds in common with her work as a public defender.

“I love playing the angles. The federal government has got formulas for everything,” she says of her office’s funding. So, she’s angling to put more cases on the books to bulk up the bottom line.

Case in point: Foster successfully reopened every crack cocaine sentence in the district in light of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which she says hadn’t been done prior.

The law aims to correct disparities in sentencing that gave harsher prison terms for convictions of rock cocaine offenses versus convictions of crimes involving powder cocaine. The U.S. Supreme Court in June further ruled that the law also applied to those who were convicted before the law was passed but who were sentenced afterward.

Foster’s lobbying succeeded, and as a result, she leveraged funds for a new attorney and realigned the responsibilities of another position in hopes of further widening the office’s services.

“I want all of those cases out of here in six months,” she says of the crack cocaine cases.

Foster inherited an agency that since its founding 17 years ago had been run exclusively by Bill Marsh, who retired this summer.

“I believe I’ve got the best staff in Indianapolis,” Foster says. “I would put my staff of lawyers up against any firm in town.” Staff attorneys are Gwen Beitz, Joe Cleary, Bill Dazey, Mark Donahoe, Juval Scott and Sara Varner.

IFCD attorneys will be working some high-profile cases soon, including the prosecution of 42 members of the Outlaws Motorcycle Club of Indianapolis on drug, extortion and other charges; and the prosecution of two Westville Correctional Facility inmates accused of running a prison methamphetamine and heroin smuggling ring.

IFCD board president Mark Inman has known Foster since they both were students at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law in the early 1980s, and he says she rose to the top of a qualified group of candidates.

“We were fortunate with what we had in front of us, but Monica stood out because of her experience, and she had some very good ideas about what to do with the office,” Inman says.

Among those ideas: Doing habeas work for the 58 inmates on federal death row in Terre Haute, which lies within the Southern District’s jurisdiction. It’s another angle for Foster. “I think it’s not right that our office has not had a presence in those cases,” she says.

She argues those on federal death row received unequal defenses in various federal courts around the country, and there are strong arguments to be made – including economic ones – that appellate federal death row work should be handled, with the court’s consent, in her office.

Inman says Foster has always shown an ability to make big things happen.

“Both of us were interested in doing criminal defense work from the get-go, and she’s always been able to speak her mind and voice her opinion, and yet she’s always been very collegial and able to get along with people,” Inman says.

Killing the death penalty

“Oh, we killed the death penalty in Indiana.”

Foster is talking about a concerted effort by defense attorneys that led to the adoption of Criminal Procedure Rule 24 in 1992 and subsequent changes that raised the requirements for death penalty defense as well as the cost of trying those cases.

She acknowledges her hyperbole – the death penalty is still on the books – but she says it will be rare when a prosecutor makes the call to try a capital case. “At the end of the day, we wanted to save people more than they wanted to kill them,” she says.

“She has a stellar reputation as someone that not only knows what she’s doing, but cares about what she’s doing,” says Indianapolis private practice criminal defense attorney Ross G. Thomas, who represented clients on a multi-defendant case with Foster in federal court years ago.

Lewis Wagner LLP founding partner Robert F. Wagner has known Foster since she was a student. “My wife and I kind of adopted her,” he says.

“I recognized early on when working with Monica that she was just very, very bright, and I see a lot of lawyers,” Wagner says. “She was just one of those individuals that stood out as having an unbelievably sharp talent in recognizing issues and having the courage to work on complex and oft-times problematical cases.

“Death-penalty cases – looking back at my legal career and knowing people who have worked in the criminal end – I think they are the toughest cases anyone can ever take on,” he says. “It takes a lot of courage to look the lion in the eye, if you will, and stand up to public and private scrutiny, and hold your head up.”

Foster’s husband, defense attorney Robert Hammerle, says that because of the emotional difficulties of practicing criminal defense, the couple had an arrangement when they practiced together – they drove separate cars to the office.

“She’s an acerbically funny woman and she can find something funny in the nastiest set of legal facts,” Hammerle says. “But there’s also the downside where you wind up in some difficult moment, and you drive home by yourself, and you get over it.”

Wagner acknowledges a bit of surprise that Foster took her new position, despite what he calls a perfect fit. “She was just so damn good at what she did,” he says.

“People don’t know this, but she has a national reputation,” Wagner continues. “She travels off to different states and is considered a great lecturer. I’m from New England, and I know lawyers up there who know Monica Foster.”

U.S. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson also was a McKinney classmate of the new IFCD executive director and says the kind of experience that Foster has leading and managing teams on death penalty cases will transfer well in her new capacity.

“I think Monica is way more than a one-trick pony,” Magnus-Stinson says. “I think that she’s really worked toward a position like this her whole career.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT