November 10, 2010
From DTCIThere has been great debate in the Indiana legal community about the recent changes to Indiana’s Model Jury Instructions
that were revised to be written in plain English.
More
November 10, 2010
From DTCILibby Valos Moss lists what she has learned over the years in striving to be a good mentor.
More
October 27, 2010
Jeffrey CrabillWhen the name Rabb Emison comes to my mind, I immediately think of the word “great.”
More
October 13, 2010
From DTCIA number of recent Indiana cases have addressed the provision found in nearly all insurance policies that requires an insured
to provide its insurer with prompt notice of a claim.
More
October 13, 2010
From DTCILloyd H. Milliken, Jr., (past president) and Randall R. Riggs, partners in Frost Brown Todd, who were recognized in the September/October
2010 Super Lawyers® Corporate Counsel Edition.
John C. Trimble (past president), partner in Lewis Wagner, who has been appointed chair of the Public Policy Committee of
DRI.
More
September 29, 2010
From DTCITo prevail on a claim of negligence, a plaintiff must show that a duty exists, that the duty was breached, and that damages
resulted from that breach. It goes without saying that there can be no negligence or liability where there is no duty.
More
September 15, 2010
From DTCIAndrew Palmison discusses the possible impact the amendment to the Child WDA will have on the defense of stillbirth claims.
More
August 18, 2010
Bryce BennettBryce Bennett Jr. feels compelled to reminisce and record some of the law office history and evolution that he has witnessed
during his career and to note the blinding speed with which technology has overtaken our professional lives.
More
August 18, 2010
From DTCIDTCI is seeking ideas and authors for articles for Volume 7, No. 2 of the Indiana Civil Litigation Review.
More
August 18, 2010
From DTCICall the DTCI offices and let the DTCI help you become a more effective defense attorney!
More
August 4, 2010
Thomas SchultzHave you ever considered what it would be like to stand aboard an aircraft carrier? Have you ever wanted to meet and learn
from a Navy Seal who survived on his own behind enemy lines in Afghanistan?
More
July 21, 2010
From DTCIOn May 27, 2010, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a decision that has affected the manner in which worker’s compensation
liens are handled in third-party litigation.
More
July 21, 2010
From DTCIThe DTCI’s Awards Committee is now receiving nominations for the 2010 awards.
More
July 21, 2010
From DTCIPatricia Polis McCrory was chosen the president-elect to the Kiwanis Club of Indianapolis.
More
July 21, 2010
From DTCICongratulations to the top two teams from the DTCI-Phenix Investigations annual golf outing.
More
July 7, 2010
Misha RabinowitchRecently, in a moment of self-reflection, I found myself thinking about what I find gratifying about practicing law.
More
June 23, 2010
Audra Ferguson-AllenThe Seventh Circuit and the Indiana district courts have disallowed the “take home exam” theory of errata sheets,
which can be particularly troublesome at the summary judgment stage.
More
June 23, 2010
From DTCIThe next issue of the Indiana Civil Litigation Review will be on members’ desks in a few weeks.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAt least two attorneys are questioning how some legal publications have included articles, columns, or other types of coverage
on pending cases, and they worry that these articles may influence the judges on the cases.
More
June 9, 2010
John TwohyIn a series of decisions culminating in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., federal courts came to recognize that the
Medial Device Amendments preempted not only traditional products liability claims such as those based on an alleged defect
or implied warranty but also causes of action premised on theories such as consumer fraud.
More
May 26, 2010
Lewis WootonFor nearly every major construction project, a construction contract is entered into before construction begins. In almost
all of those contracts, provisions are made for the transfer of risk.
More
May 12, 2010
Kevin TyraAs Jerry Padgett and I discussed in our commentary, “Causation as a case-dispositive issue”
(Indiana Lawyer, Oct. 14, 2009), the Indiana Court of Appeals has held in favor of summary judgment for defendants
in instances in which the plaintiff’s negligence clearly intervened whatever fault may have been assigned to the defendant.
More
April 28, 2010
Matthew KingWhy must a defendant wait until the deposition of a plaintiff's treating physician to discover the doctor's opinions on injury
causation, the plaintiff's prognosis, or the permanency of the plaintiff's injury?
More
March 31, 2010
James Boyers, Matthew TrainorDeclaratory judgment actions in which policyholders seek insurance coverage for historical environmental contamination
under comprehensive general liability policies, umbrella insurance policies, and/or excess insurance policies present complex
legal, factual, and scientific issues to defense practitioners. Often, the alleged contamination at issue took place over
decades. These cases usually involve layers of policies offering potential coverage and significant uncertainty regarding
the potential scope of remediation costs.
More
March 17, 2010
David TempleOK, the information you are about to read may save your life! Yes, that is correct, and your families, colleagues, and even
your clients will thank you for reading this article.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!