ILNews

Disciplinary Actions - 2/13/13

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Disciplinary Actions

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission brings charges against attorneys who have violated the state’s rules for admission to the bar and Rules of Professional Conduct. The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications brings charges against judges, judicial officers, or judicial candidates for misconduct. Details of attorneys’ and judges’ actions for which they are being disciplined by the Supreme Court will be included unless they are not a matter of public record under the court’s rules.

Public reprimand
Kathryn R. Janeway, of Hendricks County, has received a public reprimand following her guilty plea to Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated. At the time, she was a deputy prosecutor in Hendricks County but has since been terminated from that job.

She self reported her arrest and conviction to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and is in full compliance with a treatment program through I.U. Health at Methodist Hospital. The costs of the proceeding are assessed against her.

Suspension
John W. Nelson, of Hamilton County, has been suspended for not reporting three criminal convictions, including for drunk driving, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, per a Jan. 28 Supreme Court order.

Nelson violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(b): Committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, and Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11.1)(a)(2): Failure to notify the commission of a guilty finding, and failure to transmit a certified copy of a guilty finding to the commission within 10 days of the finding.

He has been suspended for 180 days beginning March 8, with 30 days actively served and the remainder stayed subject to completion of at least 36 months of probation. He is working with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. The costs of the proceeding are assessed against Nelson.

Resignation
David F. Rees, of Marion County, has resigned from the bar effective Jan. 28, per a Supreme Court order. Any pending disciplinary actions against Rees are dismissed as moot. He must wait five years before petitioning for reinstatement to the practice of law. The costs of the proceeding are assessed against him.

Michael C. Kendall, of Vanderburgh County, has resigned from the bar effective Jan. 28, per a Supreme Court order. Any pending disciplinary actions against Kendall are dismissed as moot. He must wait five years before petitioning for reinstatement to the practice of law. The costs of the proceeding are assessed against him.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Can I get this form on line,if not where can I obtain one. I am eligible.

  2. What a fine example of the best of the Hoosier tradition! How sad that the AP has to include partisan snark in the obit for this great American patriot and adventurer.

  3. Why are all these lawyers yakking to the media about pending matters? Trial by media? What the devil happened to not making extrajudicial statements? The system is falling apart.

  4. It is a sad story indeed as this couple has been only in survival mode, NOT found guilty with Ponzi, shaken down for 5 years and pursued by prosecution that has been ignited by a civil suit with very deep pockets wrenched in their bitterness...It has been said that many of us are breaking an average of 300 federal laws a day without even knowing it. Structuring laws, & civilForfeiture laws are among the scariest that need to be restructured or repealed . These laws were initially created for drug Lords and laundering money and now reach over that line. Here you have a couple that took out their own money, not drug money, not laundering. Yes...Many upset that they lost money...but how much did they make before it all fell apart? No one ask that question? A civil suit against Williams was awarded because he has no more money to fight...they pushed for a break in order...they took all his belongings...even underwear, shoes and clothes? who does that? What allows that? Maybe if you had the picture of him purchasing a jacket at the Goodwill just to go to court the next day...his enemy may be satisfied? But not likely...bitterness is a master. For happy ending lovers, you will be happy to know they have a faith that has changed their world and a solid love that many of us can only dream about. They will spend their time in federal jail for taking their money from their account, but at the end of the day they have loyal friends, a true love and a hope of a new life in time...and none of that can be bought or taken That is the real story.

  5. Could be his email did something especially heinous, really over the top like questioning Ind S.Ct. officials or accusing JLAP of being the political correctness police.

ADVERTISEMENT