ILNews

Disciplinary Actions - 6/22/12

IL Staff
June 20, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Disciplinary Actions

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission brings charges against attorneys who have violated the state’s rules for admission to the bar and Rules of Professional Conduct. The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications brings charges against judges, judicial officers, or judicial candidates for misconduct. Details of attorneys’ and judges’ actions for which they are being disciplined by the Supreme Court will be included unless they are not a matter of public record under the court’s rules.

Suspension
Antolin J. Reiber, of Marion County, has been suspended for six months by the Indiana Supreme Court, per a June 5, 2012, order. The justices found Reiber violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules 1.16(d): failure to refund an unearned fee promptly upon termination of representation; 1.8(j): engaging in a sexual relationship with a client unless it began prior to the representation; 1.16(a)(1): failure to withdraw from representation when the representation will result in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; and 8.1(b): failure to respond in a timely manner to the commission’s demands for information.

The charges stem from two counts: Reiber initially refusing to refund a client’s advance payment after he was terminated as the client’s attorney and for having a sexual relationship with a different client he was representing in a protective order case. Although Reiber has not been disciplined previously for misconduct, he has had a history of noncooperation with the disciplinary commission. Previous disciplinary matters had all been dismissed. The suspension begins July 17, the costs of the proceedings are assessed against him, and Reiber may not be automatically reinstated.

Jacob A. Atanga, of Marion County, has had his suspension for noncooperation converted into an indefinite suspension, effective immediately, for failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process, per a June 5, 2012, Indiana Supreme Court order. Atanga was suspended in February for noncooperation under one pending disciplinary matter and was ordered to show cause in two other matters earlier this year. The disciplinary commission noted that Atanga has since cooperated with the commission, but objected to the lifting of his suspension based on his history of noncooperation. The other two matters from earlier this year have been dismissed as moot given his indefinite suspension.

Kristin D. Miller, of Marion County, has been suspended for noncooperation, per a June 6, 2012, Indiana Supreme Court order. The justices ordered Miller to show cause in February as to why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law. Her suspension begins immediately and she is ordered to reimburse the disciplinary commission $511.18.

Reinstatement
Louis W. Denney, of Delaware County, has been reinstated in Indiana, per a June 5, 2012, Indiana Supreme Court order. The justices ordered his suspension May 25 for failing to pay costs assessed in a disciplinary action by Oct. 1, the due date of his annual registration fee.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. How nice, on the day of my car accident on the way to work at the Indiana Supreme Court. Unlike the others, I did not steal any money or do ANYTHING unethical whatsoever. I am suing the Indiana Supreme Court and appealed the failure of the district court in SDIN to protect me. I am suing the federal judge because she failed to protect me and her abandonment of jurisdiction leaves her open to lawsuits because she stripped herself of immunity. I am a candidate for Indiana Supreme Court justice, and they imposed just enough sanction so that I am made ineligible. I am asking the 7th Circuit to remove all of them and appoint me as the new Chief Justice of Indiana. That's what they get for dishonoring my sacrifice and and violating the ADA in about 50 different ways.

  2. Can anyone please help this mother and child? We can all discuss the mother's rights, child's rights when this court only considered the father's rights. It is actually scarey to think a man like this even being a father period with custody of this child. I don't believe any of his other children would have anything good to say about him being their father! How many people are afraid to say anything or try to help because they are afraid of Carl. He's a bully and that his how he gets his way. Please someone help this mother and child. There has to be someone that has the heart and the means to help this family.

  3. I enrolled America's 1st tax-free Health Savings Account (HSA) so you can trust me. I bet 1/3 of my clients were lawyers because they love tax-free deposits, growth and withdrawals or total tax freedom. Most of the time (always) these clients are uninformed about insurance law. Employer-based health insurance is simple if you read the policy. It says, Employers (lawyers) and employees who are working 30-hours-per-week are ELIGIBLE for insurance. Then I show the lawyer the TERMINATION clause which states: When you are no longer ELIGIBLE! Then I ask a closing question (sales term) to the lawyer which is, "If you have a stroke or cancer and become too sick to work can you keep your health insurance?" If the lawyer had dependent children they needed a "Dependent Conversion Privilege" in case their child got sick or hurt which the lawyers never had. Lawyers are pretty easy sales. Save premium, eliminate taxes and build wealth!

  4. Ok, so cheap laughs made about the Christian Right. hardiharhar ... All kidding aside, it is Mohammad's followers who you should be seeking divine protection from. Allahu Akbar But progressives are in denial about that, even as Europe crumbles.

  5. Father's rights? What about a mothers rights? A child's rights? Taking a child from the custody of the mother for political reasons! A miscarriage of justice! What about the welfare of the child? Has anyone considered parent alienation, the father can't erase the mother from the child's life. This child loves the mother and the home in Wisconsin, friends, school and family. It is apparent the father hates his ex-wife more than he loves his child! I hope there will be a Guardian Ad Litem, who will spend time with and get to know the child, BEFORE being brainwashed by the father. This is not just a child! A little person with rights and real needs, a stable home and a parent that cares enough to let this child at least finish the school year, where she is happy and comfortable! Where is the justice?

ADVERTISEMENT