ILNews

Dispute over Uptown Business Center in SoBro gets messier

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A months-long court feud over a retail building at the southwest corner of 49th Street and College Avenue in Indianapolis has become even more heated now that the owner has sought bankruptcy in an attempt to delay foreclosure on the structure.

The dispute started in October when the lender tried to take possession of the Uptown Business Center, whose owner, Leif Hinterberger and his partners, owed $802,500 under the defaulted mortgage, according to the suit filed in Marion Superior Court.

But late last month the fight over ownership spilled into federal court when Hinterberger filed to reorganize the assets of Uptown Business Center LLC under the protection of Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

In the filing, Hinterberger lists owner assets of nearly $1.4 million, or the assessed value of the building whose tenants include the Upland Brewery tasting room and The Paw Patch Veterinary Hospital.

Liabilities total about $1.1 million, the bulk of which is a $761,917 mortgage to Alpha Capital LLC. The bankruptcy filing also names Arturo DeRosa, Donald C. Arbogast Jr., Dan Fortune and Steve LaCross, who hold second mortgages on the property.

Alpha Capital bought the original mortgage on the building from Minnesota-based PSB Credit Services Inc. about the time foreclosure proceedings began, according to court documents.

Hinterberger says he’s willing to pay the debt but argues that PSB Credit Services is still the rightful owner of the mortgage, not Alpha Capital. He expects the bankruptcy proceeding to clarify the ownership issue.

Hinterberger specifically accuses Bryan Chandler, a principal of Alpha Capital, and his partners of trying to undermine his attempt to resolve the debt and instead take possession of the business center.

“We believe there have been attempts to hide their true motives, manipulate the legal process and take our properties, our assets, and our long-term community and economic investments,” Hinterberger said in an email.

Chandler, a local real estate investor, did not return phone calls seeking comment. But he and Hinterberger have crossed paths before.

Hinterberger in 2011 lost control of six properties across the street from the Uptown Business Center on the northwest corner of the intersection of 49th and College, where he had hoped to build a $19 million mixed-use project called The Uptown.

The properties on the northwest corner are now controlled by Strategic Mortgage Funding, a company operated by Chandler that invests in distressed mortgages.

A lawyer for Alpha Capital dismissed Hinterberger’s July 29 bankruptcy filing as a last-ditch effort to stall foreclosure on his Uptown Business Center.

“It’s our belief that it was put in place to delay procedures,” said Amy VonDielingen, a partner at Wooden & McLaughlin LLP.

A court document filed by Alpha Capital supporting its attempt to foreclose says Alpha has made concessions in an attempt to resolve the matter without taking possession of the property.

Alpha said that it agreed to delay foreclosure for three months provided that Hinterberger and his partners made payments in December and January of $2,500 per month. Alpha also agreed to accept $550,000 to settle the mortgage default, an amount nearly $250,000 less than what is owed on the unpaid principal, according to court documents.

“The forbearance agreement gave defendants exactly what they claimed they wanted — time to pay off the loan,” lawyers for Alpha wrote in a July court motion. “Despite the plain and unambiguous terms, defendants now challenge Alpha’s right to enforce the note and mortgage. But defendants cannot put the toothpaste back in the tube.”

In a phone interview, Hinterberger’s lawyer, Rob Cheeseborough, repeated their stance.

“My client wants to pay every dollar to the ultimate holder of that note, not [to] the alleged holder,” Cheeseborough said. “The [chapter] 11 will make it so he pays the appropriate party.”

Court documents show that Hinterberger bought the building in 2005 for $250,000 and so far has spent $1.2 million on renovations.

This story was originally published by Indianapolis Business Journal at IBJ.com.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. No second amendment, pro life, pro traditional marriage, reagan or trump tshirts will be sold either. And you cannot draw Mohammed even in your own notebook. And you must wear a helmet at all times while at the fair. And no lawyer jokes can be told except in the designated protest area. And next year no crucifixes, since they are uber offensive to all but Catholics. Have a nice bland day here in the Lego movie. Remember ... Everything is awesome comrades.

  2. Thank you for this post . I just bought a LG External DVD It came with Cyber pwr 2 go . It would not play on Lenovo Idea pad w/8.1 . Your recommended free VLC worked great .

  3. All these sites putting up all the crap they do making Brent Look like A Monster like he's not a good person . First off th fight actually started not because of Brent but because of one of his friends then when the fight popped off his friend ran like a coward which left Brent to fend for himself .It IS NOT a crime to defend yourself 3 of them and 1 of him . just so happened he was a better fighter. I'm Brent s wife so I know him personally and up close . He's a very caring kind loving man . He's not abusive in any way . He is a loving father and really shouldn't be where he is not for self defense . Now because of one of his stupid friends trying to show off and turning out to be nothing but a coward and leaving Brent to be jumped by 3 men not only is Brent suffering but Me his wife , his kids abd step kidshis mom and brother his family is left to live without him abd suffering in more ways then one . that man was and still is my smile ....he's the one real thing I've ever had in my life .....f@#@ You Lafayette court system . Learn to do your jobs right he maybe should have gotten that year for misdemeanor battery but that s it . not one person can stand to me and tell me if u we're in a fight facing 3 men and u just by yourself u wouldn't fight back that you wouldn't do everything u could to walk away to ur family ur kids That's what Brent is guilty of trying to defend himself against 3 men he wanted to go home tohisfamily worse then they did he just happened to be a better fighter and he got the best of th others . what would you do ? Stand there lay there and be stomped and beaten or would u give it everything u got and fight back ? I'd of done the same only I'm so smallid of probably shot or stabbed or picked up something to use as a weapon . if it was me or them I'd do everything I could to make sure I was going to live that I would make it hone to see my kids and husband . I Love You Brent Anthony Forever & Always .....Soul 1 baby

  4. Good points, although this man did have a dog in the legal fight as that it was his mother on trial ... and he a dependent. As for parking spaces, handicap spots for pregnant women sure makes sense to me ... er, I mean pregnant men or women. (Please, I meant to include pregnant men the first time, not Room 101 again, please not Room 101 again. I love BB)

  5. I have no doubt that the ADA and related laws provide that many disabilities must be addressed. The question, however, is "by whom?" Many people get dealt bad cards by life. Some are deaf. Some are blind. Some are crippled. Why is it the business of the state to "collectivize" these problems and to force those who are NOT so afflicted to pay for those who are? The fact that this litigant was a mere spectator and not a party is chilling. What happens when somebody who speaks only East Bazurkistanish wants a translator so that he can "understand" the proceedings in a case in which he has NO interest? Do I and all other taxpayers have to cough up? It would seem so. ADA should be amended to provide a simple rule: "Your handicap, YOUR problem". This would apply particularly to handicapped parking spaces, where it seems that if the "handicap" is an ingrown toenail, the government comes rushing in to assist the poor downtrodden victim. I would grant wounded vets (IED victims come to mind in particular) a pass on this.. but others? Nope.

ADVERTISEMENT