DTCI: A virtual office for the legal profession?

April 19, 2017
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

DTCI-moss-libby-valosImagine starting your day checking email and making phone calls all while sitting comfortably at home in your pajama pants (or whatever attire you desire to wear first thing in the morning). Now imagine that you are able to start every work day in the same fashion because you work from home. Is this really a possibility for lawyers in the future, or is our profession not cut out for the virtual office? While I cannot offer solutions in this article, I hope the following will encourage law firms to think outside the box and not immediately dismiss such an arrangement. reports the non-self-employed population who regularly work from home has grown by 103 percent since 2005. In January 2016, 3.7 million employees — 2.8 percent of the workforce — worked from home at least half the time. While some law firms have already implemented policies that allow work-from-home arrangements on a part-time or full-time basis, it has not yet become the norm in our profession. However, could this be the wave of the future? What are the benefits and pitfalls of offering employees the option of working from a virtual office?

Certainly, there are advantages for a law firm having attorneys who work from a virtual office. The law firm can lower its overhead by reducing the size of its physical office(s) and the number of support staff. If a virtual office allows more flexibility for attorneys, it is likely that they would enjoy greater job satisfaction and be less likely to change employers. There cannot be enough said about generating a good work-life balance that a virtual office can offer.

A law firm may also find itself more attractive to candidates who are uninterested in the traditional 40- to 50-hour- plus work week spent at an office away from family and friends. Attorneys who are working virtually can be more efficient without interruptions that often come from working in an office environment; this can result in increased client satisfaction.

Despite the advantages that can accrue to law firms that offer a work-from-home arrangement, I can also envision some pitfalls. First, attorneys lose the camaraderie that comes with working many hours with colleagues in the same space. It may also be more difficult to mentor and train young associates when there is no opportunity to show them how to handle different situations rather than simply telling them. The collaborative approach used by many attorneys to work on cases would be lost in some respect without the ability to engage in banter over different issues arising throughout the litigation process. There is something to be said for discussing a case or issue with another colleague; it often leads to an approach to the case different from what was originally planned.

But are these potential pitfalls enough to cause law firms to abandon the idea of attorneys working in a virtual setting? Camaraderie can be fostered with face-to-face meetings on a regular basis, through telephone conferences and firm-sponsored events. The associates entering the legal profession have grown up in a world of technology and may better receive criticism and mentoring via email and telephone conversations. That is the way they learned in school, and they may find it easier to learn how to be a good lawyer in the way that is familiar to them. Attorneys could still discuss specific cases and issues, the conversation would just be held via telephone or email, rather than in person. In fact, perhaps omitting the face-to-face conversation may prompt some to raise additional issues or ask questions they would not have raised for fear of offending the other attorney. It is much easier to be brutally honest to someone, even those you admire and respect, from behind a computer.

I haven’t even touched on the practicalities and logistics of how an attorney could work in a virtual office, including managing documents, security issues that arise in a paperless office, use of paralegals and support staff, and so forth. That would be an entirely different article — one much longer than this. But if your firm is approached about a virtual office arrangement and your immediate reaction is negative, perhaps some of my comments will cause you to think twice and be open to a new idea. Besides, who wouldn’t want to work in a world of elastic waist pants?•


Libby Valos Moss is a partner in the Indian-apolis office of Kightlinger & Gray and serves on the DTCI Board of Directors. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(

  2. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways:

  3. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  4. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

  5. Here's my two cents. While in Texas in 2007 I was not registered because I only had to do it for ten years. So imagine my surprise as I find myself forced to register in Texas because indiana can't get their head out of their butt long enough to realize they passed an ex post facto law in 2006. So because Indiana had me listed as a failure to register Texas said I had to do it there. Now if Indiana had done right by me all along I wouldn't need the aclu to defend my rights. But such is life.