ILNews

DTCI: Anchors away! Navigate to the DRI annual meeting

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

DTCI-SchultzHave you ever considered what it would be like to stand aboard an aircraft carrier? Have you ever wanted to meet and learn from a Navy Seal who survived on his own behind enemy lines in Afghanistan? Do you like beautiful weather and great restaurants? If your answer is yes to any of these questions, then the DRI Annual Meeting in California Oct. 20-24, 2010, is the place for you.

For the first time ever, the DRI Annual Meeting will be in San Diego. If you have never attended an annual meeting before, this would be a great one to be your first. And if you are a regular attendee, then we certainly look forward to seeing you again at this great event. Not only does the DRI Annual Meeting provide great CLE, but it also provides a number of opportunities for networking, meeting with your clients, and participation in many substantive law committee meetings, not to mention an overall good time with your friends in the defense bar.

It should come as no surprise that at the DTCI Annual Meeting last year in Bloomington, Ind., many of the past presidents of DTCI cited the relationships that they had built over the years with their involvement in DRI as an important part of their legal careers and experience.

This year DRI is blessed with a number of spectacular speakers. At the opening ceremony Oct. 21, Marcus Luttrell, a former U.S. Navy Seal and author of The New York Times best seller “Lone Survivor,” will take us through a story of courage, sacrifice, honor, and patriotism – his battle to survive in the Afghanistan mountains. Thursday’s awards luncheon will include a presentation by Matt Miller, author, radio host, and consultant who is a columnist for The Daily Beast and The Washington Post and a contributing editor at Fortune. On Friday, Soledad O’Brien, anchor and CNN special correspondent, will speak about the importance of mentoring, and on Saturday Mara Liasson, the political correspondent for National Public Radio, will talk about the current political climate and its impact on the legal profession.

In addition to these speakers, you can earn up to 11.5 hours of CLE credit at the annual meeting on subjects including national health-care reform and what it mean to us; the financial crisis, its origins, lawsuits, and coverage issues; social networking for litigation and business development; and discovery issues in the American civil justice system and a call for reform.

If the education and speakers are not enough, DRI has made plans for a number of social activities. On Thursday night, there will be a networking reception aboard the USS Midway Museum, which was the largest ship in the world when christened in 1945 and which served as the Persian Gulf flagship for Operation Desert Storm in 1991. Another networking reception will be Friday, conducted by the Young Lawyer’s Committee. The week’s social activities will be capped off Saturday night at the Presidential Gala and installation ceremony, which will include a DRI silent auction of many fabulous items.

In addition to all these activities, the fun and sun of San Diego itself will be at your doorstep. Nearby beaches, several hiking trails, or trips to Sea World, and the world famous San Diego Zoo are just a few of the wonderful things the city has to offer.

If you have been considering a DRI Annual Meeting for a while and are looking for one to which you can bring your family, this is the year to attend. Register before Sept. 22 and receive $200 off the registration price. For registration and hotel materials log on to www.DRI.org.

I look forward to seeing you there!•

Thomas R. Schultz is a partner in the Indianapolis firm of Schultz & Pogue and is immediate past president of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana. He is the current Indiana representative to DRI. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT