ILNews

DTCI: Belonging to DRI can better your practice, the law and your life

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

DTCI-Kyrouac-scottAs the DTCI state representative for DRI, I think it beneficial to remind the defense bar why membership in DRI is so important.

DRI is the leading organization of private-practice attorneys and in-house counsel who strive to provide high-quality, balanced service to their individual and corporate clients. It comprises more than 25 substantive committees whose focus is to develop ongoing and critical dialogue about areas of practice. DRI provides access to resources and tools to grow your practice: Members can search a database of more than 65,000 experts; attend renowned CLE seminars, conferences and webcasts; network with 22,000-plus like-minded defense practitioners; and more.

DRI focuses on five main goals:

• Education: To teach, educate and improve the skills of its members;

• Justice: To strive for improvement in the civil justice system;

• Balance: To encourage balance in the justice system in the minds of potential jurors and on all fields where disputes are resolved;

• Economics: To assist members in dealing with the economic realities of the practice, including the competitive legal marketplace and the efficient resolution of litigation; and

• Professionalism and service: To urge members to practice ethically and responsibly, keeping in mind the lawyer’s responsibilities that go beyond the interest of the client to the good of the American society as a whole.

DRI is the largest international membership organization of attorneys representing the interests of business and individuals in civil litigation. Diversity is a core value at DRI and is fundamental to the success of the organization. It seeks the innumerable benefits and contributions that the perspectives, backgrounds, cultures and life experiences a diverse membership provides to our organization. Furthermore, its members and leaders are encouraged to be leaders of other defense organizations. DRI encourages all organizations and law firms to promote diversity, inclusion and civility in their membership and leadership.

The annual DRI meeting will be held Oct. 16-20 at the Sheridan Hotel in Chicago. The theme of the meeting is “Energizing Your Career; Making Rain in the Windy City.” Chicago is a dynamic hub of the Midwest and the home of the blues, comedy and the Cubs. What better setting for New York Times best-selling author Dan Buettner to share his thoughts on “Blue Zones” and “The Secrets of Living Longer”? Charles Krauthammer, M.D., also will present on the future of health care, medicine and bioethics. Illinois Supreme Court Justice Mary Jane Theis will share tips concerning effective oral advocacy. In addition, there will be sharing of the latest deployments in commercial litigation, medical malpractice, professional liability, product liability, trucking law and trial practice. This blockbuster national seminar in our own backyard is simply not one to miss.

As Indiana’s leader for DRI, I want to personally encourage you to join our organization and attend the annual meeting for the betterment of your practice, the judicial system and of your life. The knowledge gained from membership and attendance at the annual meeting is only exceeded by the networking contacts and friendships that you gain.

If I can answer any of your questions about DRI, please call me at 812-917-2804.•

__________

Mr. Kyrouac is a partner in Wilkinson Goeller Modesitt Wilkinson & Drummy and is a former president of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT